Cadence Thresholds For Moderate Intensity Walking In Adults With Heart Failure

Previous studies have shown that a walking cadence of 100 steps/min corresponds with moderate physical activity intensity among the general population. However, less is known about the cadence-intensity relationship in individuals with low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) due to chronic disease. PURPOSE: To explore cadence thresholds for absolutely-defined moderate to vigorous intensity (≥3 metabolic equivalents [METs]) in adults with chronic heart failure (HF). METHODS: Adults with HF (n = 16, mean age = 60.3 yrs) completed treadmill-based cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET) across multiple time points (median = 2.5 per participant) while wearing ActiGraph-GT9X accelerometer on the ankle and waist. Cadence (steps/min) at both sites was recorded, and the corresponding intensity level (METs) was measured using indirect calorimetry throughout the CPET. A quadratic regression model was established to estimate cadence thresholds at 3 METs for each test. For participants with multiple CPETs, the estimated cadence thresholds were averaged across tests. Descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation (SD), and range were estimated. A paired-sample t-test was conducted to compare the estimated cadence thresholds between the ankle and waist. To investigate factors influencing variability in the estimated cadence thresholds between sites, a linear regression analysis was performed with V̇O2 peak as the independent variable and the absolute difference in cadence (ankle-waist) as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Ankle-based cadence corresponding to 3 METs averaged 85.4 steps/min (SD = 12.8; range = 59.5-101.3 steps/min), while waist-based cadence was significantly lower, with a mean of 65.5 steps/min (SD = 12.9; range = 37.9-88.8 steps/min), as determined by a paired-sample t-test (p < .001). The linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between V̇O2peak and the cadence difference (p = 0.0074), with V̇O2 peak explaining 46% of the variability in cadence difference. CONCLUSION: Adults with HF achieved moderate-intensity walking at a lower cadence than the 100 steps/min threshold established for healthy adults, highlighting the need for tailored cadence guidelines for this clinical population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001155172.62396.04
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cadence Thresholds For Moderate Intensity Walking In Adults With Heart Failure

Youngdeok Kim, Syed Imran Ahmed, Danielle L. Kirkman, Salvatore Carbone et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Cadence Thresholds For Moderate Intensity Walking In Adults With Heart Failure

Youngdeok Kim, Syed Imran Ahmed, Danielle L. Kirkman, Salvatore Carbone, Natalie J. Bohmke, Julian Kenyon, Hayley Billingsley, Jessica Geller, Jisu Kim, Jung Min Lee
article en

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that a walking cadence of 100 steps/min corresponds with moderate physical activity intensity among the general population. However, less is known about the cadence-intensity relationship in individuals with low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) due to chronic disease. PURPOSE: To explore cadence thresholds for absolutely-defined moderate to vigorous intensity (≥3 metabolic equivalents [METs]) in adults with chronic heart failure (HF). METHODS: Adults with HF (n = 16, mean age = 60.3 yrs) completed treadmill-based cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET) across multiple time points (median = 2.5 per participant) while wearing ActiGraph-GT9X accelerometer on the ankle and waist. Cadence (steps/min) at both sites was recorded, and the corresponding intensity level (METs) was measured using indirect calorimetry throughout the CPET. A quadratic regression model was established to estimate cadence thresholds at 3 METs for each test. For participants with multiple CPETs, the estimated cadence thresholds were averaged across tests. Descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation (SD), and range were estimated. A paired-sample t-test was conducted to compare the estimated cadence thresholds between the ankle and waist. To investigate factors influencing variability in the estimated cadence thresholds between sites, a linear regression analysis was performed with V̇O2 peak as the independent variable and the absolute difference in cadence (ankle-waist) as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Ankle-based cadence corresponding to 3 METs averaged 85.4 steps/min (SD = 12.8; range = 59.5-101.3 steps/min), while waist-based cadence was significantly lower, with a mean of 65.5 steps/min (SD = 12.9; range = 37.9-88.8 steps/min), as determined by a paired-sample t-test (p < .001). The linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between V̇O2peak and the cadence difference (p = 0.0074), with V̇O2 peak explaining 46% of the variability in cadence difference. CONCLUSION: Adults with HF achieved moderate-intensity walking at a lower cadence than the 100 steps/min threshold established for healthy adults, highlighting the need for tailored cadence guidelines for this clinical population.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.