Acft Performance, Maximal Aerobic Capacity, Eating Habits, And Body Composition Between Active-duty Personnel And Rotc Cadets

PURPOSE: The Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) assesses the physical and combat readiness of U.S. Army personnel, evolving with insights into the physical demands of ground combat. While many studies focus on Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadets, it is important to understand how these findings apply to active-duty soldiers. This study compares the ACFT performance of active-duty personnel to ROTC cadets, aiming to determine if body composition, VO2 max, and eating habits (HEI-2020) can predict ACFT performance in active-duty soldiers. METHODS: This retrospective analysis compared 42 male active-duty soldiers to 53 male ROTC cadets. Demographics, anthropometrics, body composition, HEI-2020, VO2 max, and ACFT scores were recorded during their semi-annual fitness testing. An independent-sample t-test was conducted to identify differences in HEI-2020, VO2 max, body composition, anthropometric measurements, and ACFT scores between ROTC cadets and active-duty participants. Multiple linear regression was used to predict ACFT performance in active-duty soldiers. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in total ACFT scores between active-duty personnel and ROTC cadets. Active-duty soldiers were older by an average of 3.6 ± 0.98 years (P < .001), had a higher BMI of 1.49 ± 0.78 (P = .041), and had 4.39 ± 1.9 kg more lean body mass (LBM) than ROTC cadets. Among active-duty soldiers, LBM explained 25% of the variability in total ACFT scores (F(1,31) = 10.5, P = .003). While ROTC cadets generally had healthier diets, these differences did not significantly impact ACFT performance. When analyzing combined data, 48% of the variability in total ACFT scores was explained (F(4,89) = 19.3, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights key physical and nutritional differences between active-duty soldiers and ROTC cadets. Despite differences in age, BMI, and LBM, both groups had similar ACFT scores. The findings suggest that while ROTC cadets benefit from structured training, active-duty soldiers' longer training periods may enhance VO2 max. Notably, LBM was a significant predictor of ACFT performance, emphasizing its importance over body fat percentage. Future research should explore these areas further to optimize military fitness and performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001159936.10347.33
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acft Performance, Maximal Aerobic Capacity, Eating Habits, And Body Composition Between Active-duty Personnel And Rotc Cadets

Anthony Acevedo, Spencer Posey, Zac Zeigler
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
article

Acft Performance, Maximal Aerobic Capacity, Eating Habits, And Body Composition Between Active-duty Personnel And Rotc Cadets

Anthony Acevedo, Spencer Posey, Zac Zeigler
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) assesses the physical and combat readiness of U.S. Army personnel, evolving with insights into the physical demands of ground combat. While many studies focus on Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadets, it is important to understand how these findings apply to active-duty soldiers. This study compares the ACFT performance of active-duty personnel to ROTC cadets, aiming to determine if body composition, VO2 max, and eating habits (HEI-2020) can predict ACFT performance in active-duty soldiers. METHODS: This retrospective analysis compared 42 male active-duty soldiers to 53 male ROTC cadets. Demographics, anthropometrics, body composition, HEI-2020, VO2 max, and ACFT scores were recorded during their semi-annual fitness testing. An independent-sample t-test was conducted to identify differences in HEI-2020, VO2 max, body composition, anthropometric measurements, and ACFT scores between ROTC cadets and active-duty participants. Multiple linear regression was used to predict ACFT performance in active-duty soldiers. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in total ACFT scores between active-duty personnel and ROTC cadets. Active-duty soldiers were older by an average of 3.6 ± 0.98 years (P < .001), had a higher BMI of 1.49 ± 0.78 (P = .041), and had 4.39 ± 1.9 kg more lean body mass (LBM) than ROTC cadets. Among active-duty soldiers, LBM explained 25% of the variability in total ACFT scores (F(1,31) = 10.5, P = .003). While ROTC cadets generally had healthier diets, these differences did not significantly impact ACFT performance. When analyzing combined data, 48% of the variability in total ACFT scores was explained (F(4,89) = 19.3, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights key physical and nutritional differences between active-duty soldiers and ROTC cadets. Despite differences in age, BMI, and LBM, both groups had similar ACFT scores. The findings suggest that while ROTC cadets benefit from structured training, active-duty soldiers' longer training periods may enhance VO2 max. Notably, LBM was a significant predictor of ACFT performance, emphasizing its importance over body fat percentage. Future research should explore these areas further to optimize military fitness and performance.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Grand Canyon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.