Assessment & Treatment Approaches Of Physical Therapists Treating Runners

Physical Therapists (PTs) use a variety of strategies to assess and treat runners. PURPOSE: To assess occurrence of reasons and approaches used by PTs treating runners. METHODS: A Qualtrics survey was distributed to PTs treating runners. Runners’ reasons to seek treatment and treatment approaches were measured by a Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data with responses divided into two groups, those with fewer continuing education (CE) hours related to running analysis and running-related intervention (20 or less) and those with more than 21 hours. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to examine significant differences between groups based on CE hours. RESULTS: There were 58 PTs that completed the survey with 29 in each group based on CE. The most common reason runners seek treatment was knee pain (M = 2.84, SD = 0.67) and least common was performance enhancement (M = 1.64, SD = 1.22). The most common treatment approach was hip/knee strengthening (M = 3.55, SD = 0.65) and the least common was augmented feedback (M = 0.78, SD = 1.06). There was significantly higher occurrence of assessment of foot/ankle pain (U = 320, p = 0.049), performance enhancement (U = 259, p = .010), running form analysis (U = 148, p = <.001), and training schedule (U = 276, p = .021) for those with more than 20 hours of CE hours compared to those with less than 20 hours. Additionally, there was a significantly higher occurrence of gait retraining (U = 187, p = <.001) and use of augmented feedback (U = 299, p = 0.036) between groups. Back pain, hip/pelvic pain, knee pain, analysis, mobility, strengthening, fascial manipulation, taping, dry needling, running shoe recommendation, pain neuroscience education, mindfulness, and diaphragmatic breathing as assessment and treatment approaches were not significant between groups. CONCLUSION: PTs with greater than 20 hours of CE in running assessment and running-related intervention resulted in advanced assessment and treatment approaches. Runners may tend to seek services from PTs with more hours of continuing education in these areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001160160.98863.06
Primary Topic
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment & Treatment Approaches Of Physical Therapists Treating Runners

Christopher Covert, Reed Greenwood, Nicole Hodges, Cheryl Obregon
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
article

Assessment & Treatment Approaches Of Physical Therapists Treating Runners

Christopher Covert, Reed Greenwood, Nicole Hodges, Cheryl Obregon
article en

Abstract

Physical Therapists (PTs) use a variety of strategies to assess and treat runners. PURPOSE: To assess occurrence of reasons and approaches used by PTs treating runners. METHODS: A Qualtrics survey was distributed to PTs treating runners. Runners’ reasons to seek treatment and treatment approaches were measured by a Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data with responses divided into two groups, those with fewer continuing education (CE) hours related to running analysis and running-related intervention (20 or less) and those with more than 21 hours. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to examine significant differences between groups based on CE hours. RESULTS: There were 58 PTs that completed the survey with 29 in each group based on CE. The most common reason runners seek treatment was knee pain (M = 2.84, SD = 0.67) and least common was performance enhancement (M = 1.64, SD = 1.22). The most common treatment approach was hip/knee strengthening (M = 3.55, SD = 0.65) and the least common was augmented feedback (M = 0.78, SD = 1.06). There was significantly higher occurrence of assessment of foot/ankle pain (U = 320, p = 0.049), performance enhancement (U = 259, p = .010), running form analysis (U = 148, p = <.001), and training schedule (U = 276, p = .021) for those with more than 20 hours of CE hours compared to those with less than 20 hours. Additionally, there was a significantly higher occurrence of gait retraining (U = 187, p = <.001) and use of augmented feedback (U = 299, p = 0.036) between groups. Back pain, hip/pelvic pain, knee pain, analysis, mobility, strengthening, fascial manipulation, taping, dry needling, running shoe recommendation, pain neuroscience education, mindfulness, and diaphragmatic breathing as assessment and treatment approaches were not significant between groups. CONCLUSION: PTs with greater than 20 hours of CE in running assessment and running-related intervention resulted in advanced assessment and treatment approaches. Runners may tend to seek services from PTs with more hours of continuing education in these areas.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Bowling Green State University (US), University of Charleston (US), Methodist University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.