Associations Between Fitness Profiles And Psychosocial Factors Among College Students Entering A Lifetime Fitness Program

Despite evidence linking physical activity (PA) to health outcomes, college students often struggle to maintain adequate PA levels. While required college PA programs aim to address this issue, the relationship between psychosocial factors and fitness outcomes remains important to understand. PURPOSE: This study examined how exercise self-efficacy and perceived barriers relate to baseline fitness profiles in a required college fitness course. METHODS: Using a quasi-experimental pre-post design, baseline data were collected from undergraduate students (N = 2,015; age = 19.0 ± 1.7 years; 61.1% female) entering in a required semester-long Lifetime Fitness course. Fitness measures (dependent variables) included resting heart rate (HR), recovery HR, muscular endurance (1-minute push-ups), and flexibility (sit-and-reach). Psychosocial measures (independent variables) included exercise self-efficacy (5-point scale) and perceived barriers (5-point scale). Separate multiple regression analyses examined associations between self-efficacy and perceived barriers with fitness measures, controlling for age, sex, and BMI. RESULTS: Higher exercise self-efficacy (mean: 3.1 ± 0.9) demonstrated consistent associations across all measures, showing strongest relationships with regular push-ups (b = 3.9 repetitions, p < .001, R2 = 0.37), followed by modified push-ups (b = 2.0 repetitions, p < .001, R2 = 0.09), flexibility (b = 0.4 inches, p < .001) and lower resting HR (b = -1.5 bpm, p < .001). Higher perceived barriers (mean: 2.3 ± 0.7) were associated with fewer regular push-ups (b = -1.8 repetitions, p < .001) and higher resting HR (b = 1.0 bpm, p = .011). Sex differences revealed females having lower regular push-up performance (b = -13.5 repetitions, p < .001) but greater flexibility (b = 1.9 inches, p < .001) and higher resting HR (b = 2.1 bpm, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Results indicate that exercise self-efficacy and perceived barriers significantly predict baseline fitness profiles across multiple domains. The strength of these relationships varied by fitness measure and sex, with the strongest model explaining 37% of variance in push-up performance. These findings suggest that addressing psychosocial factors, especially self-efficacy, may be an important consideration in designing college PA programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001155248.03013.25
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations Between Fitness Profiles And Psychosocial Factors Among College Students Entering A Lifetime Fitness Program

Jimikaye B. Courtney, Erik D. Hanson, Cláudio L. Battaglini, Becca Battaglini et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Physical Education and Pedagogy
article

Associations Between Fitness Profiles And Psychosocial Factors Among College Students Entering A Lifetime Fitness Program

Jimikaye B. Courtney, Erik D. Hanson, Cláudio L. Battaglini, Becca Battaglini, Ayange S. Ayangeakaa
article en

Abstract

Despite evidence linking physical activity (PA) to health outcomes, college students often struggle to maintain adequate PA levels. While required college PA programs aim to address this issue, the relationship between psychosocial factors and fitness outcomes remains important to understand. PURPOSE: This study examined how exercise self-efficacy and perceived barriers relate to baseline fitness profiles in a required college fitness course. METHODS: Using a quasi-experimental pre-post design, baseline data were collected from undergraduate students (N = 2,015; age = 19.0 ± 1.7 years; 61.1% female) entering in a required semester-long Lifetime Fitness course. Fitness measures (dependent variables) included resting heart rate (HR), recovery HR, muscular endurance (1-minute push-ups), and flexibility (sit-and-reach). Psychosocial measures (independent variables) included exercise self-efficacy (5-point scale) and perceived barriers (5-point scale). Separate multiple regression analyses examined associations between self-efficacy and perceived barriers with fitness measures, controlling for age, sex, and BMI. RESULTS: Higher exercise self-efficacy (mean: 3.1 ± 0.9) demonstrated consistent associations across all measures, showing strongest relationships with regular push-ups (b = 3.9 repetitions, p < .001, R2 = 0.37), followed by modified push-ups (b = 2.0 repetitions, p < .001, R2 = 0.09), flexibility (b = 0.4 inches, p < .001) and lower resting HR (b = -1.5 bpm, p < .001). Higher perceived barriers (mean: 2.3 ± 0.7) were associated with fewer regular push-ups (b = -1.8 repetitions, p < .001) and higher resting HR (b = 1.0 bpm, p = .011). Sex differences revealed females having lower regular push-up performance (b = -13.5 repetitions, p < .001) but greater flexibility (b = 1.9 inches, p < .001) and higher resting HR (b = 2.1 bpm, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Results indicate that exercise self-efficacy and perceived barriers significantly predict baseline fitness profiles across multiple domains. The strength of these relationships varied by fitness measure and sex, with the strongest model explaining 37% of variance in push-up performance. These findings suggest that addressing psychosocial factors, especially self-efficacy, may be an important consideration in designing college PA programs.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Physical Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.