Does Joint Hypermobility Alter Response To FIT Teens In Adolescents With Fibromyalgia? A Case Study

Symptomatic joint hypermobility (JH) conditions are often underdiagnosed, disabling, and commonly co-occur with juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM).1 The FIT Teens program combines cognitive-behavioral therapy and neuromuscular training for JFM pain management. PURPOSE: To evaluate the responsiveness of a participant with JFM and JH to FIT Teens evidenced by changes to biomechanical, strength, and psychosocial contributors to pain. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patient-reported measures (Table) and biomechanical data collected at baseline and after FIT Teens program completion from a participant with JFM and JH (Beighton score 6/9).2 Landing/jumping task data were collected using a 3D motion capture system and knee strength via isokinetic dynamometry. RESULTS: The large increase in knee abduction and slight decrease in knee flexion angles post-intervention (Fig 1), suggests that the increased maximum depth of center of mass (Table 1) was achieved through more frontal than sagittal plane knee motion—a less safe movement pattern. Despite this altered movement strategy, increased knee extension strength with reduced disability, pain, and kinesiophobia was evidenced (Table 1). CONCLUSION: Patient-reported outcomes and strength improved, but landing/jumping biomechanics showed a riskier movement pattern. Reduced pain and kinesiophobia may have encouraged a more confident yet exploratory movement strategy. Future research should explore if biopsychosocial profiles predict response to movement programs and if tailored and additional training can better support those with both JH and JFM. Supported by: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [R01 AR070474 and P30 AR076316] and the Ehlers Danlos Society, New York, NY. Tessa Hulburt, PhD, is supported by the Emory Health Services Research Center Training Grant [T32 HS029585].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001155364.35216.0a
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Joint Hypermobility Alter Response To FIT Teens In Adolescents With Fibromyalgia? A Case Study

Susmita Kashikar‐Zuck, Gregory D. Myer, Scott Bonnette, Staci Thomas et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Does Joint Hypermobility Alter Response To FIT Teens In Adolescents With Fibromyalgia? A Case Study

Susmita Kashikar‐Zuck, Gregory D. Myer, Scott Bonnette, Staci Thomas, Christopher A. DiCesare, Andrew Schille, Tessa Hulburt, Taylor Grossman
article en

Abstract

Symptomatic joint hypermobility (JH) conditions are often underdiagnosed, disabling, and commonly co-occur with juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM).1 The FIT Teens program combines cognitive-behavioral therapy and neuromuscular training for JFM pain management. PURPOSE: To evaluate the responsiveness of a participant with JFM and JH to FIT Teens evidenced by changes to biomechanical, strength, and psychosocial contributors to pain. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patient-reported measures (Table) and biomechanical data collected at baseline and after FIT Teens program completion from a participant with JFM and JH (Beighton score 6/9).2 Landing/jumping task data were collected using a 3D motion capture system and knee strength via isokinetic dynamometry. RESULTS: The large increase in knee abduction and slight decrease in knee flexion angles post-intervention (Fig 1), suggests that the increased maximum depth of center of mass (Table 1) was achieved through more frontal than sagittal plane knee motion—a less safe movement pattern. Despite this altered movement strategy, increased knee extension strength with reduced disability, pain, and kinesiophobia was evidenced (Table 1). CONCLUSION: Patient-reported outcomes and strength improved, but landing/jumping biomechanics showed a riskier movement pattern. Reduced pain and kinesiophobia may have encouraged a more confident yet exploratory movement strategy. Future research should explore if biopsychosocial profiles predict response to movement programs and if tailored and additional training can better support those with both JH and JFM. Supported by: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [R01 AR070474 and P30 AR076316] and the Ehlers Danlos Society, New York, NY. Tessa Hulburt, PhD, is supported by the Emory Health Services Research Center Training Grant [T32 HS029585].

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.