Relationships Between Patient-Reported Outcome Measures And Movement Screen Performance In Collegiate Dancers

Movement screenings allow for identification of limited mobility and movement compensations which may be related to numerous underlying factors. Integration of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with physical findings provide a more comprehensive view to effectively assess and treat patients. There have been recent efforts to encourage incorporation of PROMs and movement screens into dance settings as demonstrated in traditional sports settings, however there is concern of generalizability of findings in dancers. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine relationships between PROMs and movement screen performance in collegiate dancers. METHODS: Collegiate dancers (n = 9, age: 19.89 ± 1.36 years, ballet experience: 13.33 ± 1.94 years) over the age of 18, with at least 3 years of ballet experience and currently practicing ballet were enrolled in this two-session study. Session one included completion of the Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Survey. During session two, subjects were asked to perform a Dance-Specific Movement Screen (DSMS). Surveys and movement screens were scored, then the mean and standard deviation were calculated. T-scores were determined for the PROMIS Global Health Survey. Spearman’s (ρ) correlations were run to determine relationships with significance set at p ≤ .05. RESULTS: For the session one outcomes, collegiate dancers scored 88.00 ± 11.82 on the DFOS and 50.07 ± 7.67 on the PROMIS Global Health Survey. In session two, they scored 20.11 ± 1.27 on the DSMS. A positive relationship was observed between total PROMIS T-score and total DFOS score, ρ = 0.814, p = 0.008. Total PROMIS T-scores were also positively correlated with total DSMS scores, ρ = 0.901, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Significant relationships between PROMs with traditional and dance-specific movement screens indicate potential for generalizability of the PROMIS Global Health Survey in dance populations. Further research may contribute to the promotion of traditional PROM use in dancers for clinicians less familiar with dance settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001157268.98000.1f
Primary Topic
Diversity and Impact of Dance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationships Between Patient-Reported Outcome Measures And Movement Screen Performance In Collegiate Dancers

L. Colby Mangum, E. Kelly Callahan
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Diversity and Impact of Dance
article

Relationships Between Patient-Reported Outcome Measures And Movement Screen Performance In Collegiate Dancers

L. Colby Mangum, E. Kelly Callahan
article en

Abstract

Movement screenings allow for identification of limited mobility and movement compensations which may be related to numerous underlying factors. Integration of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with physical findings provide a more comprehensive view to effectively assess and treat patients. There have been recent efforts to encourage incorporation of PROMs and movement screens into dance settings as demonstrated in traditional sports settings, however there is concern of generalizability of findings in dancers. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine relationships between PROMs and movement screen performance in collegiate dancers. METHODS: Collegiate dancers (n = 9, age: 19.89 ± 1.36 years, ballet experience: 13.33 ± 1.94 years) over the age of 18, with at least 3 years of ballet experience and currently practicing ballet were enrolled in this two-session study. Session one included completion of the Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Survey. During session two, subjects were asked to perform a Dance-Specific Movement Screen (DSMS). Surveys and movement screens were scored, then the mean and standard deviation were calculated. T-scores were determined for the PROMIS Global Health Survey. Spearman’s (ρ) correlations were run to determine relationships with significance set at p ≤ .05. RESULTS: For the session one outcomes, collegiate dancers scored 88.00 ± 11.82 on the DFOS and 50.07 ± 7.67 on the PROMIS Global Health Survey. In session two, they scored 20.11 ± 1.27 on the DSMS. A positive relationship was observed between total PROMIS T-score and total DFOS score, ρ = 0.814, p = 0.008. Total PROMIS T-scores were also positively correlated with total DSMS scores, ρ = 0.901, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Significant relationships between PROMs with traditional and dance-specific movement screens indicate potential for generalizability of the PROMIS Global Health Survey in dance populations. Further research may contribute to the promotion of traditional PROM use in dancers for clinicians less familiar with dance settings.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Central Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Diversity and Impact of Dance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.