Students’ Perceptions of Feedback on Fluency and Pronunciation from AI and Teachers

Feedback on students’ speaking performance is crucial in teaching and learning contexts. However, since human teachers may not always be available, artificial intelligence (AI) technology can serve as an alternative for providing feedback. This study examined students’ perceptions of feedback on fluency and pronunciation provided by both a human tutor and AI. The research involved seven L1 Indonesian participants enrolled in an online English course. Feedback was based on a speaking task about college admission, and their audio recordings were analyzed for fluency and pronunciation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis to explore participants’ perceptions of feedback from AI and human teachers. The results indicated that most students appreciated feedback from both sources but preferred AI for fluency feedback and human tutors for pronunciation feedback. As a result, participants generally favored a hybrid approach more comprehensive feedback, as students perceived that each source had strengths that complemented the other’s weaknesses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31274/psllt.18417
Primary Topic
Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students’ Perceptions of Feedback on Fluency and Pronunciation from AI and Teachers

Andrias Tri Susanto
Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Innovations
article

Students’ Perceptions of Feedback on Fluency and Pronunciation from AI and Teachers

Andrias Tri Susanto
article en

Abstract

Feedback on students’ speaking performance is crucial in teaching and learning contexts. However, since human teachers may not always be available, artificial intelligence (AI) technology can serve as an alternative for providing feedback. This study examined students’ perceptions of feedback on fluency and pronunciation provided by both a human tutor and AI. The research involved seven L1 Indonesian participants enrolled in an online English course. Feedback was based on a speaking task about college admission, and their audio recordings were analyzed for fluency and pronunciation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis to explore participants’ perceptions of feedback from AI and human teachers. The results indicated that most students appreciated feedback from both sources but preferred AI for fluency feedback and human tutors for pronunciation feedback. As a result, participants generally favored a hybrid approach more comprehensive feedback, as students perceived that each source had strengths that complemented the other’s weaknesses.

Iowa State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.