Accurate, Secure and Explainable bitcoin forecasting

Forecasting the price of bitcoin assets is a difficult task, especially as bitcoins are highly volatile and speculative. In this paper we leverage the non linear capability of deep and machine learning models to enhance bitcoin forecasts. We propose a systematic comparison of different deep learning and machine learning models, based on their Accuracy, Security and Explainability characteristics. The empirical findings reveal that, while CNN-GRU, GRU and LSTM are the most accurate models, for maximum cumulative return and risk adjusted performance GRU and CNN are preferred. Whereas, for transparent and stable decision-making, Random Forest and XGboost are a good choice and, for robustness, CNN and LSTM are the best choice. Ultimately, the choice of a model depends on the objectives of the analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2025.130974
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accurate, Secure and Explainable bitcoin forecasting

Paolo Giudici, Morteza Bagheri
1 citations
Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
2.11
article

Accurate, Secure and Explainable bitcoin forecasting

Paolo Giudici, Morteza Bagheri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Forecasting the price of bitcoin assets is a difficult task, especially as bitcoins are highly volatile and speculative. In this paper we leverage the non linear capability of deep and machine learning models to enhance bitcoin forecasts. We propose a systematic comparison of different deep learning and machine learning models, based on their Accuracy, Security and Explainability characteristics. The empirical findings reveal that, while CNN-GRU, GRU and LSTM are the most accurate models, for maximum cumulative return and risk adjusted performance GRU and CNN are preferred. Whereas, for transparent and stable decision-making, Random Forest and XGboost are a good choice and, for robustness, CNN and LSTM are the best choice. Ultimately, the choice of a model depends on the objectives of the analysis.

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its ApplicationsVol. 678
University of Pavia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.