MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS IN FLOOD ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW FOR THE PERIOD 2014–2024

The paper presents a bibliometric analysis of publications from 2014 to 2024 dealing with the application of multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM) in flood assessment and management. The most commonly used methods are identified, as well as the trend towards the development of hybrid models that integrate MCDM with statistical techniques, theories that handle uncertainties well, and machine learning algorithms. The analysis shows a global representation of authors, with dominant contributions from Asia, and a focus of the most cited papers on vulnerability assessment, urban development and Geographic Information System (GIS) integration. The variety of methods indicates the absence of a universal approach, which encourages the development of contextually adapted models. The paper concludes that further research should strive for greater transparency, participation and standardization, in order to increase the applicability of MCDM methods in the complex conditions of modern risk management

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70995/suts8756
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS IN FLOOD ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW FOR THE PERIOD 2014–2024

Duško Tešić, Adis Puška, Darko Božanić
1 citations
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
0.80
article

MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS IN FLOOD ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW FOR THE PERIOD 2014–2024

Duško Tešić, Adis Puška, Darko Božanić
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The paper presents a bibliometric analysis of publications from 2014 to 2024 dealing with the application of multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM) in flood assessment and management. The most commonly used methods are identified, as well as the trend towards the development of hybrid models that integrate MCDM with statistical techniques, theories that handle uncertainties well, and machine learning algorithms. The analysis shows a global representation of authors, with dominant contributions from Asia, and a focus of the most cited papers on vulnerability assessment, urban development and Geographic Information System (GIS) integration. The variety of methods indicates the absence of a universal approach, which encourages the development of contextually adapted models. The paper concludes that further research should strive for greater transparency, participation and standardization, in order to increase the applicability of MCDM methods in the complex conditions of modern risk management

Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS IN FLOOD ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW FOR THE PERIOD 2014–2024 — Duško Tešić, Adis Puška, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS