Learning Lifted STRIPS Models from Action Traces alone: A Simple, General, and Scalable Solution

Learning STRIPS action models from action traces alone is a challenging problem as it involves learning the domain predicates as well. In this work, a novel approach is introduced which, like the well-known LOCM systems, is scalable, but like SAT approaches, is sound and complete. Furthermore, the approach is general and imposes no restrictions on the hidden domain or the number or arity of the predicates. The new learning method is based on an efficient, novel test that checks whether the assumption that a predicate is affected by a set of action patterns, namely, actions with specific argument positions, is consistent with the traces. The predicates and action patterns that pass the test provide the basis for the learned domain that is then easily completed with preconditions and static predicates. The new method is studied theoretically and experimentally. For the latter, the method is evaluated on traces and graphs obtained from standard classical domains like the 8-puzzle, which involve hundreds of thousands of states and transitions. The learned representations are then verified on larger instances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v35i1.36117
Primary Topic
Human Pose and Action Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning Lifted STRIPS Models from Action Traces alone: A Simple, General, and Scalable Solution

Nicolas Jansen, Héctor Geffner, Jonas Gösgens
Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
Human Pose and Action Recognition
article

Learning Lifted STRIPS Models from Action Traces alone: A Simple, General, and Scalable Solution

Nicolas Jansen, Héctor Geffner, Jonas Gösgens
article en

Abstract

Learning STRIPS action models from action traces alone is a challenging problem as it involves learning the domain predicates as well. In this work, a novel approach is introduced which, like the well-known LOCM systems, is scalable, but like SAT approaches, is sound and complete. Furthermore, the approach is general and imposes no restrictions on the hidden domain or the number or arity of the predicates. The new learning method is based on an efficient, novel test that checks whether the assumption that a predicate is affected by a set of action patterns, namely, actions with specific argument positions, is consistent with the traces. The predicates and action patterns that pass the test provide the basis for the learned domain that is then easily completed with preconditions and static predicates. The new method is studied theoretically and experimentally. For the latter, the method is evaluated on traces and graphs obtained from standard classical domains like the 8-puzzle, which involve hundreds of thousands of states and transitions. The learned representations are then verified on larger instances.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and SchedulingVol. 35(1)
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Australian Government, European Commission, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Human Pose and Action Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Learning Lifted STRIPS Models from Action Traces alone: A Simple, General, and Scalable Solution — Nicolas Jansen, Héctor Geffner, et al. · Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS