On Picking Good Policies: Leveraging Action-Policy Testing in Policy Training

Testing is a natural approach to assess the quality of learned action policies π. Prior work introduced policy testing in AI planning as searching for bugs in π, that is, states where π is sub-optimal with respect to a given testing objective. Beyond quality assurance, an obvious application of these methods is policy selection: given several π to choose from, we can use testing to select the "least buggy" one. Here, we integrate testing-based policy selection into the training process. This includes making more informed decisions when selecting the final policy after training, as well as choosing more promising intermediate policies during the training process. Our experiments with ASNets action policies show that integrating testing allows us to more reliably obtain good-quality policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v35i1.36116
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Picking Good Policies: Leveraging Action-Policy Testing in Policy Training

Daniel Fišer, Jan Eisenhut, Jörg Hoffmann, Isabel Valera
Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

On Picking Good Policies: Leveraging Action-Policy Testing in Policy Training

Daniel Fišer, Jan Eisenhut, Jörg Hoffmann, Isabel Valera
article en

Abstract

Testing is a natural approach to assess the quality of learned action policies π. Prior work introduced policy testing in AI planning as searching for bugs in π, that is, states where π is sub-optimal with respect to a given testing objective. Beyond quality assurance, an obvious application of these methods is policy selection: given several π to choose from, we can use testing to select the "least buggy" one. Here, we integrate testing-based policy selection into the training process. This includes making more informed decisions when selecting the final policy after training, as well as choosing more promising intermediate policies during the training process. Our experiments with ASNets action policies show that integrating testing allows us to more reliably obtain good-quality policies.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and SchedulingVol. 35(1)
German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE), Max Planck Institute for Informatics (DE), Max Planck Institute for Software Systems (DE), Aalborg University (DK), Saarland University (DE)
European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On Picking Good Policies: Leveraging Action-Policy Testing in Policy Training — Daniel Fišer, Jan Eisenhut, et al. · Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS