The use of diagnostic tools to assess the risks of chemicals to freshwater ecosystems: towards a unified evaluation framework

The risk assessment of chemicals relies on multiple tools to quantify the ecological responses of ecosystems to existing chemical pollution. These tools are broadly categorized into three major groups: toxic pressure assessments, bioassays, and ecological monitoring. Here, we examine the strengths and limitations of these approaches, their current level of implementation for freshwater ecosystems across Europe, and their ability to evaluate the impacts of chemicals under field conditions. Additionally, we analyze the correspondence between results obtained from these tools when applied to a monitoring dataset from German streams. Our evaluation showed that no single tool can perfectly characterize the environmental impacts of chemical mixtures. However, each provides distinct lines of evidence, enabling the identification of chemicals driving ecological risks and the biological endpoints most likely to be affected, with ecological monitoring tools having the potential to show long-term ecosystem impairment. Finally, we propose recommendations to better understand the discrepancies between the outcomes of different methods and explore their potential integration into a unified water quality evaluation framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Management
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02265-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The use of diagnostic tools to assess the risks of chemicals to freshwater ecosystems: towards a unified evaluation framework

Melis Muz, Francisco Sylvester, Udo Hommen, Peter C. von der Ohe et al.
1 citations
Environmental Management
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
1.20
article

The use of diagnostic tools to assess the risks of chemicals to freshwater ecosystems: towards a unified evaluation framework

Melis Muz, Francisco Sylvester, Udo Hommen, Peter C. von der Ohe, Belén González-Gaya, Paul J. Van den Brink, Beate Isabella Escher, Saskia Finckh, Andreu Rico, Alina Koch, Nicolas Pucheux, J. de Jonge, Tobias Schulze, Gastón Alurralde, Naroa Lopez-Herguedas, Gabriele Treu, Matthias Liess, Kelsey Ng, Anne Bado‐Nilles, ‪Nikiforos Alygizakis, E. F. Cody, Rémy Beaudouin, Mirco Bundschuh, S. Jannicke Moe, Yves Verhaegen, Manu Soto, Henner Hollert, Iker Alvarez-Mora
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The risk assessment of chemicals relies on multiple tools to quantify the ecological responses of ecosystems to existing chemical pollution. These tools are broadly categorized into three major groups: toxic pressure assessments, bioassays, and ecological monitoring. Here, we examine the strengths and limitations of these approaches, their current level of implementation for freshwater ecosystems across Europe, and their ability to evaluate the impacts of chemicals under field conditions. Additionally, we analyze the correspondence between results obtained from these tools when applied to a monitoring dataset from German streams. Our evaluation showed that no single tool can perfectly characterize the environmental impacts of chemical mixtures. However, each provides distinct lines of evidence, enabling the identification of chemicals driving ecological risks and the biological endpoints most likely to be affected, with ecological monitoring tools having the potential to show long-term ecosystem impairment. Finally, we propose recommendations to better understand the discrepancies between the outcomes of different methods and explore their potential integration into a unified water quality evaluation framework.

Environmental ManagementVol. 75(12)
Ikerbasque (ES), Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Universitat de València (ES), Stockholm University (SE), University of the Basque Country (ES), Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission (FI), University of Koblenz and Landau (DE), Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NO), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Concawe (BE), Environmental Institute (SK), Institut national de l'environnement industriel et des risques (FR), German Environment Agency (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (DE), IMDEA Water (ES), Technological University Dublin (IE), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Generalitat Valenciana, Norges Forskningsråd, Norsk Institutt for Vannforskning
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.