Automating the Generation of Prompts for LLM-based Action Choice in PDDL Planning

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized a large variety of NLP tasks. An active debate is to what extent they can do reasoning and planning. Prior work has assessed the latter in the specific context of PDDL planning, based on manually converting three PDDL domains into natural language (NL) prompts. Here we automate this conversion step, showing how to leverage an LLM to automatically generate NL prompts from PDDL input. Our automatically generated NL prompts result in similar LLM-planning performance as the previous manually generated ones. Beyond this, the automation enables us to run much larger experiments, providing for the first time a broad evaluation of LLM planning performance in PDDL. Our NL prompts yield better performance than PDDL prompts and simple template-based NL prompts. Compared to symbolic planners, LLM planning lags far behind; but in some domains, our best LLM configuration scales up further than A* using LM-cut.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v35i1.36126
Primary Topic
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automating the Generation of Prompts for LLM-based Action Choice in PDDL Planning

Katharina Stein, Daniel Fišer, Jörg Hoffmann, Alexander Koller
Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
article

Automating the Generation of Prompts for LLM-based Action Choice in PDDL Planning

Katharina Stein, Daniel Fišer, Jörg Hoffmann, Alexander Koller
article en

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized a large variety of NLP tasks. An active debate is to what extent they can do reasoning and planning. Prior work has assessed the latter in the specific context of PDDL planning, based on manually converting three PDDL domains into natural language (NL) prompts. Here we automate this conversion step, showing how to leverage an LLM to automatically generate NL prompts from PDDL input. Our automatically generated NL prompts result in similar LLM-planning performance as the previous manually generated ones. Beyond this, the automation enables us to run much larger experiments, providing for the first time a broad evaluation of LLM planning performance in PDDL. Our NL prompts yield better performance than PDDL prompts and simple template-based NL prompts. Compared to symbolic planners, LLM planning lags far behind; but in some domains, our best LLM configuration scales up further than A* using LM-cut.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and SchedulingVol. 35(1)
German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE), Aalborg University (DK), Saarland University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Automating the Generation of Prompts for LLM-based Action Choice in PDDL Planning — Katharina Stein, Daniel Fišer, et al. · Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS