A Scoping Review of Intrateam Conflict and Conflict Management in Sport

The purpose of this review was to identify and synthesize the current sport literature on intrateam conflict and conflict management. Among other criteria, articles were included if intrateam conflict or intrateam conflict management was listed in the study purpose statement. Eighteen articles were included. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis revealed that individual-level factors (e.g., personality) were common conflict sources, while outcomes (e.g., cohesion) occurred at the group level. The review identified four intervention studies and two on coach conflict management styles, suggesting that a range of strategies may be effective. Findings from this review reveal a need for more research in sport settings that measures intrateam conflict. An initial conceptual model of intrateam conflict is provided, which follows an input–mediator–output framework, and sport scholars should aim to develop a sport-specific theory of intrateam conflict to better guide future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kinesiology Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2025-0008
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Scoping Review of Intrateam Conflict and Conflict Management in Sport

C. C. Zimmerman, Andrew P. Driska, Lauren Secaras
Kinesiology Review
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

A Scoping Review of Intrateam Conflict and Conflict Management in Sport

C. C. Zimmerman, Andrew P. Driska, Lauren Secaras
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to identify and synthesize the current sport literature on intrateam conflict and conflict management. Among other criteria, articles were included if intrateam conflict or intrateam conflict management was listed in the study purpose statement. Eighteen articles were included. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis revealed that individual-level factors (e.g., personality) were common conflict sources, while outcomes (e.g., cohesion) occurred at the group level. The review identified four intervention studies and two on coach conflict management styles, suggesting that a range of strategies may be effective. Findings from this review reveal a need for more research in sport settings that measures intrateam conflict. An initial conceptual model of intrateam conflict is provided, which follows an input–mediator–output framework, and sport scholars should aim to develop a sport-specific theory of intrateam conflict to better guide future research.

Kinesiology Review
Denison University (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Scoping Review of Intrateam Conflict and Conflict Management in Sport — C. C. Zimmerman, Andrew P. Driska, et al. · Kinesiology Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS