Retail rate design for decarbonized and resilient electricity systems

Abstract This perspective examines trade-offs in designing residential electricity rates that improve economic efficiency while ensuring feasible and distributionally favorable outcomes. We analyze rate structures across three key dimensions: improving economic efficiency by reflecting social marginal costs; ensuring affordability, technology access, and residual cost recovery; and simplicity in customer understanding and implementation. While real-time pricing based on social marginal costs is the most economically efficient choice, intermediate approaches like time-of-use rates or critical peak rates may better balance competing objectives. We recommend that decision-makers (1) move towards pricing environmental externalities in time-varying electricity rates, (2) introduce time-varying rates with predictable price periods gradually, (3) expand access to flexibility enabling technologies for low-income customers, and (4) carefully design fixed charges for residual cost recovery to avoid distributionally regressive impacts. These findings are particularly relevant as utilities nationwide consider rate reforms to support electrification while maintaining ratepayer affordability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Energy
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/ae077b
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Energy Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retail rate design for decarbonized and resilient electricity systems

Inês L. Azevedo, Madalsa Singh, Bruce Cain
1 citations
Progress in Energy
Smart Grid Energy Management
0.73
article

Retail rate design for decarbonized and resilient electricity systems

Inês L. Azevedo, Madalsa Singh, Bruce Cain
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This perspective examines trade-offs in designing residential electricity rates that improve economic efficiency while ensuring feasible and distributionally favorable outcomes. We analyze rate structures across three key dimensions: improving economic efficiency by reflecting social marginal costs; ensuring affordability, technology access, and residual cost recovery; and simplicity in customer understanding and implementation. While real-time pricing based on social marginal costs is the most economically efficient choice, intermediate approaches like time-of-use rates or critical peak rates may better balance competing objectives. We recommend that decision-makers (1) move towards pricing environmental externalities in time-varying electricity rates, (2) introduce time-varying rates with predictable price periods gradually, (3) expand access to flexibility enabling technologies for low-income customers, and (4) carefully design fixed charges for residual cost recovery to avoid distributionally regressive impacts. These findings are particularly relevant as utilities nationwide consider rate reforms to support electrification while maintaining ratepayer affordability.

Progress in EnergyVol. 7(4)
Rochester Institute of Technology (US), Environmental and Water Resources Engineering (IL), Palo Alto Institute (US), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Smart Grid Energy Management
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.