Understanding the morality of unbelievers: Secular beliefs about right and wrong in ten countries

Many people around the world believe that to be moral, one must believe in God. However, individuals who do not believe in God also hold distinct ethical beliefs. Similar to theists, non-theists in different cultures may share overarching narratives about morality and what it is founded upon – a possibility that remains to be systematically researched. In the present study, we utilised open-ended survey data to explore what non-religious non-theists from ten countries (N = 996) described as the basis of their views on right and wrong. We furthermore investigated how different beliefs about morality clustered together. The findings point towards cross-culturally recurring non-theistic beliefs and belief clusters pertaining to 1) important moral principles and 2) non-theistic ways to view the source of morality. We furthermore discuss country-specific findings, such as the importance of ‘conscience’ for Turkish and Czech participants and ‘cultural Christianity’ in the Danish sample. Altogether, the results support research indicating that a lack of belief in God does not entail moral relativism and question views on non-theists primarily seeing morality as self-constructed. Instead, our findings point towards a more prominent role of social interaction and ‘social contract’ in non-theistic views about right and wrong. We suggest that predominant ways of measurement in moral psychology may currently engulf the diversity of non-theistic moral outlooks and communal moralities in particular. To our knowledge, the study provides the first data-driven examination of non-theists’ views on right and wrong in different cultures.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hk4w5_v2
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the morality of unbelievers: Secular beliefs about right and wrong in ten countries

Miguel Farias, Valerie van Mulukom, Everton de Oliveira Maraldi, Eva Kundtová Klocová et al.
Religion and Society Interactions
article

Understanding the morality of unbelievers: Secular beliefs about right and wrong in ten countries

Miguel Farias, Valerie van Mulukom, Everton de Oliveira Maraldi, Eva Kundtová Klocová, Hugh Turpin, Roosa Haimila, Tiina A M Parkkinen
article en

Abstract

Many people around the world believe that to be moral, one must believe in God. However, individuals who do not believe in God also hold distinct ethical beliefs. Similar to theists, non-theists in different cultures may share overarching narratives about morality and what it is founded upon – a possibility that remains to be systematically researched. In the present study, we utilised open-ended survey data to explore what non-religious non-theists from ten countries (N = 996) described as the basis of their views on right and wrong. We furthermore investigated how different beliefs about morality clustered together. The findings point towards cross-culturally recurring non-theistic beliefs and belief clusters pertaining to 1) important moral principles and 2) non-theistic ways to view the source of morality. We furthermore discuss country-specific findings, such as the importance of ‘conscience’ for Turkish and Czech participants and ‘cultural Christianity’ in the Danish sample. Altogether, the results support research indicating that a lack of belief in God does not entail moral relativism and question views on non-theists primarily seeing morality as self-constructed. Instead, our findings point towards a more prominent role of social interaction and ‘social contract’ in non-theistic views about right and wrong. We suggest that predominant ways of measurement in moral psychology may currently engulf the diversity of non-theistic moral outlooks and communal moralities in particular. To our knowledge, the study provides the first data-driven examination of non-theists’ views on right and wrong in different cultures.

Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.