Evaluation of machine learning performance on source separated passive acoustic recordings

The United States National Park Service often deploys passive acoustic monitoring devices whose data are used to characterize the ecological health of the site and quantify the level of anthropogenic sources present. The analysis of the data is then used to inform conservation management policy that protects the natural soundscape of the National Parks. Traditional methods for analyzing the acoustic recordings involve human listeners annotating a subset of this data and labeling the acoustic sources present. Manual data processing is labor intensive and relies on human perception that varies between individuals, these limitations ultimately reduce the amount of data that can be analyzed. By augmenting the manual annotation of acoustic data with machine learning (ML) this research aims to increase the quantity of data that can be annotated while achieving higher annotation confidence for acoustic sources. Previous research has shown that separating the transient acoustic sources from the background acoustic environment reduces data complexity allowing for improved characterization of the sources. This paper will evaluate the performance of machine learning models using source separated data to understand the effects it has on data annotation accuracy, hyperparameter complexity, and ML model training time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Noise Control Engineering Journal
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3397/1/377333
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of machine learning performance on source separated passive acoustic recordings

Peter Newman, Morgan Crump, Derrick Taff, Tyler Dare et al.
Noise Control Engineering Journal
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
article

Evaluation of machine learning performance on source separated passive acoustic recordings

Peter Newman, Morgan Crump, Derrick Taff, Tyler Dare, Carter A. Paprocki, Kristin Cody, Andrew Barnard
article en

Abstract

The United States National Park Service often deploys passive acoustic monitoring devices whose data are used to characterize the ecological health of the site and quantify the level of anthropogenic sources present. The analysis of the data is then used to inform conservation management policy that protects the natural soundscape of the National Parks. Traditional methods for analyzing the acoustic recordings involve human listeners annotating a subset of this data and labeling the acoustic sources present. Manual data processing is labor intensive and relies on human perception that varies between individuals, these limitations ultimately reduce the amount of data that can be analyzed. By augmenting the manual annotation of acoustic data with machine learning (ML) this research aims to increase the quantity of data that can be annotated while achieving higher annotation confidence for acoustic sources. Previous research has shown that separating the transient acoustic sources from the background acoustic environment reduces data complexity allowing for improved characterization of the sources. This paper will evaluate the performance of machine learning models using source separated data to understand the effects it has on data annotation accuracy, hyperparameter complexity, and ML model training time.

Noise Control Engineering JournalVol. 73(3)
Michigan Technological University (US), United States Naval Research Laboratory (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), California Department of Parks and Recreation (US), Engineering Acoustics (United States) (US), Vermont Law and Graduate School (US)
National Park Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.