Effects of Evaporation Modeling on Kerosene–Air Oblique Detonation

A variety of droplet evaporation models with different levels of complexity are available to numerically simulate spray two-phase flows, but their effects on the characteristics of gas–droplet oblique detonation waves (ODWs) have not been well understood. In this study, wedge-induced kerosene-droplet–air ODWs are simulated in a Eulerian–Lagrangian framework with six evaporation models, including five equilibrium models based on various assumptions on liquid thermal conductivity and a nonequilibrium model. The effects of droplet evaporation to the initiation and surface instability of ODWs are highlighted when compared to their single-phase counterparts. In kerosene-droplet–air ODWs simulated with different evaporation models, it is found that the overall flow structures and shock angles are not sensitive, but the initiation length, the combustion rate, and the initiation patterns vary significantly. Through tracking the droplet evaporation histories, the above differences are attributed to the slowing down in evaporation rate when finite-rate liquid heat conduction, internal recirculation, and surface nonequilibrium are considered successively in the model. The formation mechanisms of three initiation patterns caused by the strength variations of interior detonation and shock waves under different evaporation rates are revealed as well. The importance of accurate evaporation modeling to numerical investigations of gas–droplet ODWs is emphasized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Propulsion and Power
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b39701
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Combustion and Detonation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Evaporation Modeling on Kerosene–Air Oblique Detonation

Zijian Zhang, Wenshuo Zhang, Zixuan Zhang, Yuan Wang et al.
3 citations
Journal of Propulsion and Power
Combustion and Detonation Processes
14.98
article

Effects of Evaporation Modeling on Kerosene–Air Oblique Detonation

Zijian Zhang, Wenshuo Zhang, Zixuan Zhang, Yuan Wang, Yunfeng Liu, Haitao Chen, Ruixin Yang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

A variety of droplet evaporation models with different levels of complexity are available to numerically simulate spray two-phase flows, but their effects on the characteristics of gas–droplet oblique detonation waves (ODWs) have not been well understood. In this study, wedge-induced kerosene-droplet–air ODWs are simulated in a Eulerian–Lagrangian framework with six evaporation models, including five equilibrium models based on various assumptions on liquid thermal conductivity and a nonequilibrium model. The effects of droplet evaporation to the initiation and surface instability of ODWs are highlighted when compared to their single-phase counterparts. In kerosene-droplet–air ODWs simulated with different evaporation models, it is found that the overall flow structures and shock angles are not sensitive, but the initiation length, the combustion rate, and the initiation patterns vary significantly. Through tracking the droplet evaporation histories, the above differences are attributed to the slowing down in evaporation rate when finite-rate liquid heat conduction, internal recirculation, and surface nonequilibrium are considered successively in the model. The formation mechanisms of three initiation patterns caused by the strength variations of interior detonation and shock waves under different evaporation rates are revealed as well. The importance of accurate evaporation modeling to numerical investigations of gas–droplet ODWs is emphasized.

Journal of Propulsion and PowerVol. 41(6)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Peking University (CN), Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Combustion and Detonation Processes
14.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.