Camera traps and deep learning enable efficient large‐scale density estimation of wildlife in temperate forest ecosystems

Abstract Automated detectors such as camera traps allow the efficient collection of large amounts of data for the monitoring of animal populations, but data processing and classification are a major bottleneck. Deep learning algorithms have gained increasing attention in this context, as they have the potential to dramatically decrease the time and effort required to obtain population density estimates. However, the robustness of such an approach has not yet been evaluated across a wide range of species and study areas. This study evaluated the application of DeepFaune, an open‐source deep learning algorithm for the classification of European animal species and camera trap distance sampling (CTDS) to a year‐round dataset containing 895,019 manually classified photos from 10 protected areas across Germany. For all wild animal species and higher taxonomic groups on which DeepFaune was trained, the algorithm achieved an overall accuracy of 90%. The 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference between the CTDS estimates based on manual and automated image classification contained zero for all species and seasons with a minimum sample size of 20 independent observations per study area, except for two. Meta‐regression revealed an average difference between the classification methods of −0.005 (95% CI: −0.205–0.196) animals/km 2 . Classification success correlated with the divergence of the population density estimates, but false negative and false positive detections had complex effects on the density estimates via different CTDS parameters. Therefore, metrics of classification performance alone are insufficient to assess the effect of deep learning classifiers on the population density estimation process, which should instead be followed through entirely for proper validation. In general, however, our results demonstrate that readily available deep learning algorithms can be used in largely unsupervised workflows for estimating population densities from camera trap data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.70030
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Camera traps and deep learning enable efficient large‐scale density estimation of wildlife in temperate forest ecosystems

Gaspard Dussert, Marco Heurich, Vincent Mièle, Rudolf Reiner et al.
2 citations
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
3.43
article

Camera traps and deep learning enable efficient large‐scale density estimation of wildlife in temperate forest ecosystems

Gaspard Dussert, Marco Heurich, Vincent Mièle, Rudolf Reiner, Sönke Twietmeyer, S. Michelle Greiner, Maik Henrich, Anja Schneider, Virginie Masserey Spicher, Simon Chamaillé‐Jammes, Jürgen M. Stein, Alisa Klamm, Christian Fiderer, Axel Ballmann, Tobias Rönitz, Raffael Kratzer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Automated detectors such as camera traps allow the efficient collection of large amounts of data for the monitoring of animal populations, but data processing and classification are a major bottleneck. Deep learning algorithms have gained increasing attention in this context, as they have the potential to dramatically decrease the time and effort required to obtain population density estimates. However, the robustness of such an approach has not yet been evaluated across a wide range of species and study areas. This study evaluated the application of DeepFaune, an open‐source deep learning algorithm for the classification of European animal species and camera trap distance sampling (CTDS) to a year‐round dataset containing 895,019 manually classified photos from 10 protected areas across Germany. For all wild animal species and higher taxonomic groups on which DeepFaune was trained, the algorithm achieved an overall accuracy of 90%. The 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference between the CTDS estimates based on manual and automated image classification contained zero for all species and seasons with a minimum sample size of 20 independent observations per study area, except for two. Meta‐regression revealed an average difference between the classification methods of −0.005 (95% CI: −0.205–0.196) animals/km 2 . Classification success correlated with the divergence of the population density estimates, but false negative and false positive detections had complex effects on the density estimates via different CTDS parameters. Therefore, metrics of classification performance alone are insufficient to assess the effect of deep learning classifiers on the population density estimation process, which should instead be followed through entirely for proper validation. In general, however, our results demonstrate that readily available deep learning algorithms can be used in largely unsupervised workflows for estimating population densities from camera trap data.

Remote Sensing in Ecology and ConservationVol. 12(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), National Park Service (US), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Parks and Wildlife Service (AU), Bavarian Forest National Park (DE), Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation (TH), Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (FR), Life Services (United States) (US), University of Inland Norway (NO), Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive (FR), Kantonsschule am Burggraben (CH), Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land (DE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Biodiversa+, European Commission, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Swedish National Space Agency, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Naturvårdsverket, Norges Forskningsråd, Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz, Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.