The Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea: Losers and Winners

The legal status of the Caspian Sea has led to one of the biggest debates since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. After a long period of time, with numerous joint and bilateral meetings, this international crisis ended in 2018 as a result of the signing of a document called the Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea (CLSCS). In this article, the winning and losing sides amongst the signatories of the CLSCS were attempted to be determined by taking into account the new de facto situation in the Caspian basin in light of the geopolitical developments since 2018, through an analysis of economic, political, and legal consequences of the convention. This topic was examined through consideration of the motives behind the signatories' political actions, political connections, and the historical context. The articles of CLSCS, the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (also known as the Middle Corridor) and The Organization of Turkic States were analyzed in order to determine the various consequences of the CLSCS. In the conclusion of the article, the signatory countries of Russia and Iran were placed on the losing side, whereas the signatory countries of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan were stated to be on the winning side of the CLSCS.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Volga - Ural and Turkestan Studies
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59305/ijvuts.1614837
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea: Losers and Winners

Elza Elif Mehdiyev
1 citations
International Journal of Volga - Ural and Turkestan Studies
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
3.13
article

The Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea: Losers and Winners

Elza Elif Mehdiyev
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The legal status of the Caspian Sea has led to one of the biggest debates since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. After a long period of time, with numerous joint and bilateral meetings, this international crisis ended in 2018 as a result of the signing of a document called the Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea (CLSCS). In this article, the winning and losing sides amongst the signatories of the CLSCS were attempted to be determined by taking into account the new de facto situation in the Caspian basin in light of the geopolitical developments since 2018, through an analysis of economic, political, and legal consequences of the convention. This topic was examined through consideration of the motives behind the signatories' political actions, political connections, and the historical context. The articles of CLSCS, the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (also known as the Middle Corridor) and The Organization of Turkic States were analyzed in order to determine the various consequences of the CLSCS. In the conclusion of the article, the signatory countries of Russia and Iran were placed on the losing side, whereas the signatory countries of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan were stated to be on the winning side of the CLSCS.

International Journal of Volga - Ural and Turkestan StudiesVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.