LEGAL AMBIGUITIES AND JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN CHILD MARRIAGE DISPENSATION IN ACEH PROVINCE: LEGAL CERTAINTY AND HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS

This article examines the conditionality and dispensation of child marriage in Aceh, focusing on the effectiveness of article 7(2) of Law Number 16 of 2019, as well as the considerations of Sharia Court judges when granting marriage dispensation. Using a juridico-empirical approach, the research gathers data through interviews and documentation analysis. The findings reveal that Law No. 16/2019 does not clearly define what constitutes a "very urgent reason" or the supporting evidence required. Judges’ decisions are based on juridical and sociological considerations, balancing legal certainty with social realities. However, the practice of granting dispensations for child marriage raises significant human rights concerns. These include the potential violation of children's rights to protection, education, and development, as child marriage often results in early pregnancy, limited educational opportunities, and increased vulnerability to exploitation and abuse. The study recommends that legislators and the government develop regulations or guidelines that clearly define "extremely urgent reasons," including specific indicators and criteria. This would enhance legal certainty and ensure consistent application of the law, thereby better safeguarding children's rights. This article underscores the importance of precise legal definitions and judicial discretion in implementing child marriage laws effectively, with the ultimate goal of safeguarding children's rights, promoting gender equality, and preventing human rights violations associated with child marriage.