“Conventional” political participation in Russia: prevalence and social structuring

The article examines the political activity of Russian citizens in conventional — legal and legitimate — forms, its prevalence in comparison with other post-communist countries and Western European democracies as well as the social structuring of such activity. Research points to the passivity of civil society in Russia, which is assumed to be due to the communist political culture and the actions of the authorities aimed at controlling and restricting mass political activity. The data from the European Social Survey (ESS) on the eight main conventional forms of political activity, obtained in 2006–2018 surveys in post-communist countries — Russia, Hungary and Poland, as well as in Western European democracies, including Germany, France and Sweden, were considered. The results confirm that in Russian society, as in other post-communist countries, a small minority participates in politics, whereas in Western democracies political activism encompasses much broader social circles. There are distinct social inequalities in political participation in our country. It is closely related to social demography (it increases with higher education and decreases with age), increases under favorable conditions of mobilization (connections with other people and organizations) and political predisposition (interest in politics, internal political efficacy, party identification). The revealed facts reinforce considerations about the political passivity of Russian citizens, reflecting cultural beliefs rooted in the Soviet era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vlast i Elity (Power and Elites)
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2025.12.1.4
Primary Topic
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Conventional” political participation in Russia: prevalence and social structuring

В В Сафронов
Vlast i Elity (Power and Elites)
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
article

“Conventional” political participation in Russia: prevalence and social structuring

В В Сафронов
article en

Abstract

The article examines the political activity of Russian citizens in conventional — legal and legitimate — forms, its prevalence in comparison with other post-communist countries and Western European democracies as well as the social structuring of such activity. Research points to the passivity of civil society in Russia, which is assumed to be due to the communist political culture and the actions of the authorities aimed at controlling and restricting mass political activity. The data from the European Social Survey (ESS) on the eight main conventional forms of political activity, obtained in 2006–2018 surveys in post-communist countries — Russia, Hungary and Poland, as well as in Western European democracies, including Germany, France and Sweden, were considered. The results confirm that in Russian society, as in other post-communist countries, a small minority participates in politics, whereas in Western democracies political activism encompasses much broader social circles. There are distinct social inequalities in political participation in our country. It is closely related to social demography (it increases with higher education and decreases with age), increases under favorable conditions of mobilization (connections with other people and organizations) and political predisposition (interest in politics, internal political efficacy, party identification). The revealed facts reinforce considerations about the political passivity of Russian citizens, reflecting cultural beliefs rooted in the Soviet era.

Vlast i Elity (Power and Elites)Vol. 12(1)
Institute of Sociology (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.