Psychometric Properties of Fears of Cancer Recurrence Scales in Turkish Hematologic Cancer Patients

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Fears of cancer recurrence (FCR) represents one of the most common psychological problems in cancer patients. Therefore, valid and reliable measurement tools are needed to assess FCR in this population. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of FCR scales (Fears of Cancer Recurrence-7 Item Version [FCR-7]; FCR-4 Item Version [FCR-4]; FCR-6 Item Version [FCR-6]) in Turkish hematological cancer patients. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The study sample consisted of 239 hematological cancer patients undergoing treatment at four different state hospitals in Türkiye. <i>Results</i>: Confirmatory factor analysis results showed that all three scales had a single-factor structure (FCR-7: CFI = 0.981, TLI = 0.969, RMSEA = 0.071, SRMR = 0.028; FCR-4: CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.001, RMSEA = 0.000, SRMR = 0.004; FCR-6: CFI = 0.981, TLI = 0.965, RMSEA = 0.087, SRMR = 0.028). The model allowing for correlated error terms between the first and second items provided the best fit. Research findings also indicated that the scales possessed strict measurement invariance across gender. Convergent and discriminant validity analyses also demonstrated expected associations between FCR scale scores and psychological well-being (<i>r</i> = -0.25 to -0.34) and psychological distress (<i>r</i> = 0.33 to 0.46) variables. The known-groups validity analysis indicated that the scales were effective at differentiating between groups and that they replicated the well-established finding from previous research that women report significantly higher levels of FCR than men (<i>d</i> = 0.42-0.47). Reliability analyses indicated that all three versions of the FCR scales had high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91-0.93) and strong test-retest reliability (<i>r</i> = 0.85-0.87). <i>Conclusions</i>: Overall, the findings indicated that FCR-7, FCR-4, and FCR-6 are psychometrically sound, valid, and reliable instruments for assessing FCR in Turkish hematological cancer patients. These instruments can be used in clinical practice and research studies, as well as for evaluating intervention effectiveness in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091628
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Properties of Fears of Cancer Recurrence Scales in Turkish Hematologic Cancer Patients

Fatoş Dilan Köseoğlu, Ertuğrul Şahin, Nursel Topkaya, Ufuk Demirci et al.
Medicina
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Psychometric Properties of Fears of Cancer Recurrence Scales in Turkish Hematologic Cancer Patients

Fatoş Dilan Köseoğlu, Ertuğrul Şahin, Nursel Topkaya, Ufuk Demirci, Serkan Güven, Samet Yaman
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Fears of cancer recurrence (FCR) represents one of the most common psychological problems in cancer patients. Therefore, valid and reliable measurement tools are needed to assess FCR in this population. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of FCR scales (Fears of Cancer Recurrence-7 Item Version [FCR-7]; FCR-4 Item Version [FCR-4]; FCR-6 Item Version [FCR-6]) in Turkish hematological cancer patients. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The study sample consisted of 239 hematological cancer patients undergoing treatment at four different state hospitals in Türkiye. <i>Results</i>: Confirmatory factor analysis results showed that all three scales had a single-factor structure (FCR-7: CFI = 0.981, TLI = 0.969, RMSEA = 0.071, SRMR = 0.028; FCR-4: CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.001, RMSEA = 0.000, SRMR = 0.004; FCR-6: CFI = 0.981, TLI = 0.965, RMSEA = 0.087, SRMR = 0.028). The model allowing for correlated error terms between the first and second items provided the best fit. Research findings also indicated that the scales possessed strict measurement invariance across gender. Convergent and discriminant validity analyses also demonstrated expected associations between FCR scale scores and psychological well-being (<i>r</i> = -0.25 to -0.34) and psychological distress (<i>r</i> = 0.33 to 0.46) variables. The known-groups validity analysis indicated that the scales were effective at differentiating between groups and that they replicated the well-established finding from previous research that women report significantly higher levels of FCR than men (<i>d</i> = 0.42-0.47). Reliability analyses indicated that all three versions of the FCR scales had high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91-0.93) and strong test-retest reliability (<i>r</i> = 0.85-0.87). <i>Conclusions</i>: Overall, the findings indicated that FCR-7, FCR-4, and FCR-6 are psychometrically sound, valid, and reliable instruments for assessing FCR in Turkish hematological cancer patients. These instruments can be used in clinical practice and research studies, as well as for evaluating intervention effectiveness in this population.

MedicinaVol. 61(9)
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi (TR), Izmir University (TR), İzmir University of Economics (TR), Manisa Celal Bayar University (TR), Hitit Üniversitesi (TR), State Hospital (GB), Ege University (TR), Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi (TR), Amasya Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.