Evaluation of the Relationship Between Systemic Inflammatory Markers and Biphasic Reaction in Patients Diagnosed with Anaphylaxis

Objective: Biphasic anaphylaxis, defined as the recurrence of symptoms after initial resolution without re-exposure to the trigger, remains a significant clinical challenge.Identifying laboratory-based predictors of biphasic reactions may help optimize monitoring and management strategies.This study aimed to investigate the relationship between systemic inflammatory markers-neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), and pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV)-and the development of biphasic reactions in adult patients presenting to the emergency department with anaphylaxis. Materials and Methods:This retrospective observational study included adult patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis between January 1, 2024, and January 1, 2025, at the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital.Demographic data, clinical findings, laboratory values at presentation, and outcomes were collected.Biphasic reactions were defined as a recurrence of symptoms between 1 and 72 hours after initial improvement.Inflammatory markers were calculated from initial complete blood counts and compared between patients with and without biphasic reactions.Results: A total of 142 patients were included, of whom 14 (9.9%) experienced biphasic reactions.There were no statistically significant differences in NLR, PLR, SII, SIRI, or PIV between the biphasic and non-biphasic groups (p > 0.05 for all).Hypotension was observed more frequently in the biphasic group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.059). Conclusion:Systemic inflammatory markers derived from admission laboratory values were not significantly associated with the development of biphasic anaphylactic reactions.Further prospective studies are warranted to identify reliable biomarkers for early prediction and risk stratification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asthma Allergy Immunology
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21911/aai.2025.852
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urticaria and Related Conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Relationship Between Systemic Inflammatory Markers and Biphasic Reaction in Patients Diagnosed with Anaphylaxis

Yunsur Çevik, Handan Özen Olcay, Emine Emektar, Emel Atayık
1 citations
Asthma Allergy Immunology
Urticaria and Related Conditions
1.67
article

Evaluation of the Relationship Between Systemic Inflammatory Markers and Biphasic Reaction in Patients Diagnosed with Anaphylaxis

Yunsur Çevik, Handan Özen Olcay, Emine Emektar, Emel Atayık
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: Biphasic anaphylaxis, defined as the recurrence of symptoms after initial resolution without re-exposure to the trigger, remains a significant clinical challenge.Identifying laboratory-based predictors of biphasic reactions may help optimize monitoring and management strategies.This study aimed to investigate the relationship between systemic inflammatory markers-neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), and pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV)-and the development of biphasic reactions in adult patients presenting to the emergency department with anaphylaxis. Materials and Methods:This retrospective observational study included adult patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis between January 1, 2024, and January 1, 2025, at the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital.Demographic data, clinical findings, laboratory values at presentation, and outcomes were collected.Biphasic reactions were defined as a recurrence of symptoms between 1 and 72 hours after initial improvement.Inflammatory markers were calculated from initial complete blood counts and compared between patients with and without biphasic reactions.Results: A total of 142 patients were included, of whom 14 (9.9%) experienced biphasic reactions.There were no statistically significant differences in NLR, PLR, SII, SIRI, or PIV between the biphasic and non-biphasic groups (p > 0.05 for all).Hypotension was observed more frequently in the biphasic group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.059). Conclusion:Systemic inflammatory markers derived from admission laboratory values were not significantly associated with the development of biphasic anaphylactic reactions.Further prospective studies are warranted to identify reliable biomarkers for early prediction and risk stratification.

Asthma Allergy Immunology
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Urticaria and Related Conditions
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.