Stutter Modeling in Probabilistic Genotyping for Forensic DNA Analysis: A Casework-Driven Assessment

<b>Background:</b> Probabilistic genotyping software has become an essential tool in forensic genetics, particularly for interpreting complex DNA mixtures. Previous studies measured the impact of considering widely divergent statistical approaches in quantifying evidence, both inter- and intra-software. At a much smaller scale, this data-driven study shows how different models implemented on distinct versions of the same tool may affect the results. Among the available tools, EuroForMix stands out as a quantitative, open-source software that models various aspects of the DNA profile, including artefacts like stutter peaks. Its freeware nature allowed the use of both versions 1.9.3. and 3.4.0, between which several updates were made, including the possibility to model both back and forward stutter, compared to only modeling back stutters inputted by the expert in the earlier version. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 156 real casework sample pairs (comprising mixtures with two or three estimated contributors and associated reference) from the Portuguese Scientific Police Laboratory were analyzed using both software versions. The same input data, containing alleles and artefactual peaks, were used to reflect operational conditions. Statistical measurements were compared and further investigated. <b>Results:</b> Most Likelihood Ratio values differed in less than one order of magnitude across versions. However, exceptions were found in more complex samples, such as those with more contributors, unbalanced contributions, or greater degradation. <b>Conclusions:</b> This work emphasizes the relevance of model selection in forensic evidence quantification, even when considering different versions of the same tool. The impact of different models in statistical evaluation depends on several factors, such as sample technical conditions, genotypic profiles, and population distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genes
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16091053
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Data Analysis with R
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stutter Modeling in Probabilistic Genotyping for Forensic DNA Analysis: A Casework-Driven Assessment

Camila Costa, Nádia Pinto, Lourdes Prieto, Paulo Miguel Ferreira et al.
2 citations
Genes
Data Analysis with R
4.96
article

Stutter Modeling in Probabilistic Genotyping for Forensic DNA Analysis: A Casework-Driven Assessment

Camila Costa, Nádia Pinto, Lourdes Prieto, Paulo Miguel Ferreira, António Amorim, Sandra Costa, Érica Ribeiro Pereira
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Probabilistic genotyping software has become an essential tool in forensic genetics, particularly for interpreting complex DNA mixtures. Previous studies measured the impact of considering widely divergent statistical approaches in quantifying evidence, both inter- and intra-software. At a much smaller scale, this data-driven study shows how different models implemented on distinct versions of the same tool may affect the results. Among the available tools, EuroForMix stands out as a quantitative, open-source software that models various aspects of the DNA profile, including artefacts like stutter peaks. Its freeware nature allowed the use of both versions 1.9.3. and 3.4.0, between which several updates were made, including the possibility to model both back and forward stutter, compared to only modeling back stutters inputted by the expert in the earlier version. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 156 real casework sample pairs (comprising mixtures with two or three estimated contributors and associated reference) from the Portuguese Scientific Police Laboratory were analyzed using both software versions. The same input data, containing alleles and artefactual peaks, were used to reflect operational conditions. Statistical measurements were compared and further investigated. <b>Results:</b> Most Likelihood Ratio values differed in less than one order of magnitude across versions. However, exceptions were found in more complex samples, such as those with more contributors, unbalanced contributions, or greater degradation. <b>Conclusions:</b> This work emphasizes the relevance of model selection in forensic evidence quantification, even when considering different versions of the same tool. The impact of different models in statistical evaluation depends on several factors, such as sample technical conditions, genotypic profiles, and population distribution.

GenesVol. 16(9)
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (PT), Universidade do Porto (PT), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES), Polícia Judiciária (PT), IPO Porto (PT), Unidades Centrales Científico-Técnicas (ES), i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Data Analysis with R
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.