Comparative Analysis of Four Neural Network Methods for TEC Modeling during Ionospheric Magnetic Storms

The Total Electron Content (TEC) of the ionosphere is an important parameter for describing the ionosphere activities, and much research has been done for the accurate methods for the ionospheric TEC prediction. However, the prediction accuracy of ionospheric empirical models for TEC during geomagnetic storms is still not ideal. To address this issue, this paper aims to assess the performance of ionospheric TEC predicting methods, which involve the LSTM, the BiLSTM, the Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory combined with Attention mechanism (CNN-LSTM-Attention), and the Convolutional Neural Network-Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory combined with Attention mechanism (CNN-BiLSTM-Attention). At first, the geomagnetic storm periods are identified by comparing with the threshold of <italic>Dst</italic> index (≤–30 nT), during the years from 2004 to 2022. Then, four neural network models for the ionospheric TEC prediction are formed, through the combinations of multiple spatiotemporal parameters, such as UTS, UTC, SA, AA, CHS, and SHS. Finally, the accuracy and reliability of the four neural network models are assessed using the reference TEC dataset collected during geomagnetic storms in 2023, and three statistical index, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>, are utilized. The results show that, the performance of the CNN-BiLSTM-Attention model is superior to the other three models, with MAE ranging from 0.882 to 5.270 TECU, RMSE between 1.175 and 6.983 TECU, and <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> values exceeding 0.7. In order to better describe the difference between the predicted values and the reference values, the scatter plots of two datasets are plotted for the fitting of linear regression equations. The slope of fitted function from CNN-BiLSTM-Attention model is very close to the ideal value 1, also indicating a better performance compared to the other models.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Journal of Space Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11728/cjss2025.05.2024-0087
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Four Neural Network Methods for TEC Modeling during Ionospheric Magnetic Storms

Wudan Yan, Jian Wang, J. Zhu, Tingzhuang Yan et al.
Chinese Journal of Space Science
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Comparative Analysis of Four Neural Network Methods for TEC Modeling during Ionospheric Magnetic Storms

Wudan Yan, Jian Wang, J. Zhu, Tingzhuang Yan, Yufeng Jin
article en

Abstract

The Total Electron Content (TEC) of the ionosphere is an important parameter for describing the ionosphere activities, and much research has been done for the accurate methods for the ionospheric TEC prediction. However, the prediction accuracy of ionospheric empirical models for TEC during geomagnetic storms is still not ideal. To address this issue, this paper aims to assess the performance of ionospheric TEC predicting methods, which involve the LSTM, the BiLSTM, the Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory combined with Attention mechanism (CNN-LSTM-Attention), and the Convolutional Neural Network-Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory combined with Attention mechanism (CNN-BiLSTM-Attention). At first, the geomagnetic storm periods are identified by comparing with the threshold of <italic>Dst</italic> index (≤–30 nT), during the years from 2004 to 2022. Then, four neural network models for the ionospheric TEC prediction are formed, through the combinations of multiple spatiotemporal parameters, such as UTS, UTC, SA, AA, CHS, and SHS. Finally, the accuracy and reliability of the four neural network models are assessed using the reference TEC dataset collected during geomagnetic storms in 2023, and three statistical index, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>, are utilized. The results show that, the performance of the CNN-BiLSTM-Attention model is superior to the other three models, with MAE ranging from 0.882 to 5.270 TECU, RMSE between 1.175 and 6.983 TECU, and <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> values exceeding 0.7. In order to better describe the difference between the predicted values and the reference values, the scatter plots of two datasets are plotted for the fitting of linear regression equations. The slope of fitted function from CNN-BiLSTM-Attention model is very close to the ideal value 1, also indicating a better performance compared to the other models.

Chinese Journal of Space ScienceVol. 45(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.