Elections in hard times: factors of the incumbent defeat at the sub-national level

The results of the 2021 elections to the State Duma of the Russian Federation generally reaffirmed the electoral dominance of the United Russia party. However, unlike the 2016 electoral cycle, they also revealed the defeat of the “party in power” in four Russian regions. This article explores the causes of the incumbent party’s electoral failures at the subnational level through a paired comparative analysis of the republics of Yakutia (Sakha) and Bashkortostan. The analysis concludes that one possible factor contributing to the decline in electoral support for the “party in power” at the regional level is institutional — specifically, the presence of direct elections for heads of municipalities. In Yakutia, this institutional feature prevented the new regional leader from establishing effective political control over key political actors. By contrast, the new head of Bashkortostan, operating without such constraints, was able to quickly consolidate the regional elite, suppress opposition forces, and increase electoral support for the “party in power”, even amid epidemiological and economic crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vlast i Elity (Power and Elites)
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2025.12.1.3
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elections in hard times: factors of the incumbent defeat at the sub-national level

Stanislav Shkel
Vlast i Elity (Power and Elites)
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Elections in hard times: factors of the incumbent defeat at the sub-national level

Stanislav Shkel
article en

Abstract

The results of the 2021 elections to the State Duma of the Russian Federation generally reaffirmed the electoral dominance of the United Russia party. However, unlike the 2016 electoral cycle, they also revealed the defeat of the “party in power” in four Russian regions. This article explores the causes of the incumbent party’s electoral failures at the subnational level through a paired comparative analysis of the republics of Yakutia (Sakha) and Bashkortostan. The analysis concludes that one possible factor contributing to the decline in electoral support for the “party in power” at the regional level is institutional — specifically, the presence of direct elections for heads of municipalities. In Yakutia, this institutional feature prevented the new regional leader from establishing effective political control over key political actors. By contrast, the new head of Bashkortostan, operating without such constraints, was able to quickly consolidate the regional elite, suppress opposition forces, and increase electoral support for the “party in power”, even amid epidemiological and economic crises.

Vlast i Elity (Power and Elites)Vol. 12(1)
Institute of Sociology (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Elections in hard times: factors of the incumbent defeat at the sub-national level — Stanislav Shkel · Vlast i Elity (Power and Elites) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS