Delayed Surgical Treatment and Survival Outcome in Breast Cancer

Background: For decades, there was inconsistency regarding the association between delay in treatment initiation (surgery) and survival outcomes in breast cancer patients. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of the interval between diagnosis and curative surgery on survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on patients with stage I-III breast cancer referred to Imam Hossein Hospital in Tehran between 2011 and 2013. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model were performed to investigate the effect of delay in time from diagnosis to surgery and its effect on patients’ overall survival. Results: analysis of 93 patients who were treated with surgery at Imam Hossein Hospital showed the interval between diagnosis and surgery using various subgroup (cut-off value: 15, 30, and 45) had no effect on overall survival. However, surgery over 60 days after biopsy may be associated with worse overall survival (p=0.017). Cox proportional hazard model for comorbidities (HR and 95% CI: 0.2; 0.05-0.8, p<0.05) and distant metastasis (HR and 95%CI: 0.06; 0.01-0.23/p<0.0001) indicated a significant association with worse survival outcomes. Conclusion: The findings demonstrated that time intervals of 60 days or longer between biopsy and surgery adversely impact overall patient survival. The presence of comorbidities and metastasis is likely to reduce the overall survival during the specified intervals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Iranian Medical Council
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18502/jimc.v8i4.19551
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delayed Surgical Treatment and Survival Outcome in Breast Cancer

Fargol Farahmandi, Parynaz Parhizgar, Melika Golmohammadi, Shaghayegh Kamian
Journal of Iranian Medical Council
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Delayed Surgical Treatment and Survival Outcome in Breast Cancer

Fargol Farahmandi, Parynaz Parhizgar, Melika Golmohammadi, Shaghayegh Kamian
article en

Abstract

Background: For decades, there was inconsistency regarding the association between delay in treatment initiation (surgery) and survival outcomes in breast cancer patients. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of the interval between diagnosis and curative surgery on survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on patients with stage I-III breast cancer referred to Imam Hossein Hospital in Tehran between 2011 and 2013. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model were performed to investigate the effect of delay in time from diagnosis to surgery and its effect on patients’ overall survival. Results: analysis of 93 patients who were treated with surgery at Imam Hossein Hospital showed the interval between diagnosis and surgery using various subgroup (cut-off value: 15, 30, and 45) had no effect on overall survival. However, surgery over 60 days after biopsy may be associated with worse overall survival (p=0.017). Cox proportional hazard model for comorbidities (HR and 95% CI: 0.2; 0.05-0.8, p<0.05) and distant metastasis (HR and 95%CI: 0.06; 0.01-0.23/p<0.0001) indicated a significant association with worse survival outcomes. Conclusion: The findings demonstrated that time intervals of 60 days or longer between biopsy and surgery adversely impact overall patient survival. The presence of comorbidities and metastasis is likely to reduce the overall survival during the specified intervals.

Journal of Iranian Medical Council
Imam Hossein Hospital (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.