AI, the conflicted university, and the classroom

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has made it possible for students to complete writing assignments without undergoing the rigorous research, thinking, essay construction, and revision traditionally associated with college-level writing. What is more, this technology has made violations of academic honour policies nearly impossible to reliably demonstrate, leaving the policies largely unenforceable. This article explores the impact of generative AI within higher education by contextualizing its introduction within the neoliberal university. To clarify what is at stake, the article appeals to Alasdair MacIntyre's distinction between goods that are intrinsic to a social practice, internal goods, and those that are received as a reward for engaging in the practice, or external goods. When applied to the contemporary educational context, MacIntyre's distinction works to highlight the ways neoliberal higher education sacrifices the goods internal to academic practices in pursuing external goods such as money and recognition. MacIntyre's distinction helps us see that the threats AI poses to academic integrity are tightly linked to an overemphasis on the external goods over against the achievement of the internal goods embedded in the educational process itself. The article ends by working to recentre the goods internal to academic practices in the classroom.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhaf069
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI, the conflicted university, and the classroom

Ross Moret
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
article

AI, the conflicted university, and the classroom

Ross Moret
article en

Abstract

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has made it possible for students to complete writing assignments without undergoing the rigorous research, thinking, essay construction, and revision traditionally associated with college-level writing. What is more, this technology has made violations of academic honour policies nearly impossible to reliably demonstrate, leaving the policies largely unenforceable. This article explores the impact of generative AI within higher education by contextualizing its introduction within the neoliberal university. To clarify what is at stake, the article appeals to Alasdair MacIntyre's distinction between goods that are intrinsic to a social practice, internal goods, and those that are received as a reward for engaging in the practice, or external goods. When applied to the contemporary educational context, MacIntyre's distinction works to highlight the ways neoliberal higher education sacrifices the goods internal to academic practices in pursuing external goods such as money and recognition. MacIntyre's distinction helps us see that the threats AI poses to academic integrity are tightly linked to an overemphasis on the external goods over against the achievement of the internal goods embedded in the educational process itself. The article ends by working to recentre the goods internal to academic practices in the classroom.

Journal of Philosophy of Education
Florida State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.