Geography and area studies as critical bedfellows? The view from Singapore

Abstract While Geography and Area Studies both share the burden of the colonial past and entrenchment in American‐Eurocentrism, there is something to be gained from greater critical rapprochement between the two fields of knowledge. From Singapore as a vantage point, producing geographical knowledge through immersion in the area—broadly defined as ‘Asia’—is both an expectation and a comparative advantage. At the same time, as Singapore‐based geographers operate both inside and outside the Euro‐American intellectual heartlands, the study of area is not valorised on its own terms but pressed into service to turn the wheels of (western) critical theory to recuperate ‘other’ ways of thinking. Such a strategy has encouraged engagement with the region while ensuring legibility of knowledge production in terms of a largely western‐based reputational calculus. It also runs the risk of being largely unidirectional, translating empirical material into theoretical insights for a western audience without challenging existing hierarchies of knowledge production. There is hence a need to explore other pathways to recuperating geographical knowledge and addressing current inequalities. First, ‘Asia as method’ advocates ‘inter‐referencing’ across Asia, that is, a process of writing from Asia, and not as Asia seen in relation to the West, by drawing on regional cases that are less familiar while resisting the need to justify through western reference points. Second, over seven decades, the Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography has wrestled with presenting ‘the tropics’ as a complex and contested field of geographical inquiry, providing academic space for both local scholars working from within the tropics and those from the ‘outside’. In these ways, the study of area—rich with diverse connections and worthwhile comparators, historically constructed rather than naturally given, and fluid rather than fixed in its boundaries—offers Geography multiple ways to imagine the world differently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.70030
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Socioeconomic Development in Asia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geography and area studies as critical bedfellows? The view from Singapore

Brenda S. A. Yeoh
3 citations
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Socioeconomic Development in Asia
12.60
article

Geography and area studies as critical bedfellows? The view from Singapore

Brenda S. A. Yeoh
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract While Geography and Area Studies both share the burden of the colonial past and entrenchment in American‐Eurocentrism, there is something to be gained from greater critical rapprochement between the two fields of knowledge. From Singapore as a vantage point, producing geographical knowledge through immersion in the area—broadly defined as ‘Asia’—is both an expectation and a comparative advantage. At the same time, as Singapore‐based geographers operate both inside and outside the Euro‐American intellectual heartlands, the study of area is not valorised on its own terms but pressed into service to turn the wheels of (western) critical theory to recuperate ‘other’ ways of thinking. Such a strategy has encouraged engagement with the region while ensuring legibility of knowledge production in terms of a largely western‐based reputational calculus. It also runs the risk of being largely unidirectional, translating empirical material into theoretical insights for a western audience without challenging existing hierarchies of knowledge production. There is hence a need to explore other pathways to recuperating geographical knowledge and addressing current inequalities. First, ‘Asia as method’ advocates ‘inter‐referencing’ across Asia, that is, a process of writing from Asia, and not as Asia seen in relation to the West, by drawing on regional cases that are less familiar while resisting the need to justify through western reference points. Second, over seven decades, the Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography has wrestled with presenting ‘the tropics’ as a complex and contested field of geographical inquiry, providing academic space for both local scholars working from within the tropics and those from the ‘outside’. In these ways, the study of area—rich with diverse connections and worthwhile comparators, historically constructed rather than naturally given, and fluid rather than fixed in its boundaries—offers Geography multiple ways to imagine the world differently.

Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersVol. 50(4)
National University of Singapore (SG)
Ministry of Education, India
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Socioeconomic Development in Asia
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Geography and area studies as critical bedfellows? The view from Singapore — Brenda S. A. Yeoh · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS