The leader’s loneliness in the organizational ecosystem: identifying the influence of psychosocial and organizational factors

Purpose:The aim of the article is to analyze psychosocial and organizational predictors of loneliness among individuals in managerial roles.The author identifies the factors contributing to leader isolation and its consequences for organizational effectiveness. Methodology:The study was based on empirical data collected from 150 managers in the witokrzyskie Voivodeship using an original survey questionnaire.A correlation analysis was conducted between psychosocial and organizational variables and the levels of emotional and social loneliness.Findings: The quality of interpersonal relationships, emotional support, self-esteem, and organizational culture are significant predictors of leader loneliness.This confirms the multidimensional nature of the phenomenon and the need for comprehensive solutions.Leadership loneliness appears not only as a psychological category but also as an indicator of organizational dysfunction, manifested in the absence of affective recognition channels, insufficient psychological safety, and relational fragmentation of support structures. Research limitations:The study was cross-sectional and regional in scope.Self-assessment bias is possible.Future studies should include broader research samples and a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative tools.Practical implications: Leader loneliness-as a systemic variable-may indirectly influence organizational climate, team engagement, employee turnover, and decision-making efficiency.Preventing the psychosocial isolation of managerial staff contributes to building sustainable human capital, reduces the risk of organizational losses, and strengthens the resilience of work systems during crises.Social implications: Reducing leader loneliness supports psychological well-being and a healthy work environment, contributing to the development of more conscious leadership models in society.Chronic isolation of leaders can deepen social trust deficits, erode relational capital, and undermine the culture of dialogue and shared responsibility.This phenomenon is particularly significant in the public sector, where leadership style directly translates into the quality of public services and the sense of institutional justice.Originality/Value: This article represents one of the few empirical analyses of leader loneliness in Poland, combining psychological and organizational perspectives with practical recommendations.The empirical examination of psychosocial mechanisms affecting leadership effectiveness enriches contemporary management science discourse with an affective-relational dimension, often marginalized in quantitative studies.

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2025.227.16
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The leader’s loneliness in the organizational ecosystem: identifying the influence of psychosocial and organizational factors

Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series
Educational Innovations and Challenges
article

The leader’s loneliness in the organizational ecosystem: identifying the influence of psychosocial and organizational factors

article en

Abstract

Purpose:The aim of the article is to analyze psychosocial and organizational predictors of loneliness among individuals in managerial roles.The author identifies the factors contributing to leader isolation and its consequences for organizational effectiveness. Methodology:The study was based on empirical data collected from 150 managers in the witokrzyskie Voivodeship using an original survey questionnaire.A correlation analysis was conducted between psychosocial and organizational variables and the levels of emotional and social loneliness.Findings: The quality of interpersonal relationships, emotional support, self-esteem, and organizational culture are significant predictors of leader loneliness.This confirms the multidimensional nature of the phenomenon and the need for comprehensive solutions.Leadership loneliness appears not only as a psychological category but also as an indicator of organizational dysfunction, manifested in the absence of affective recognition channels, insufficient psychological safety, and relational fragmentation of support structures. Research limitations:The study was cross-sectional and regional in scope.Self-assessment bias is possible.Future studies should include broader research samples and a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative tools.Practical implications: Leader loneliness-as a systemic variable-may indirectly influence organizational climate, team engagement, employee turnover, and decision-making efficiency.Preventing the psychosocial isolation of managerial staff contributes to building sustainable human capital, reduces the risk of organizational losses, and strengthens the resilience of work systems during crises.Social implications: Reducing leader loneliness supports psychological well-being and a healthy work environment, contributing to the development of more conscious leadership models in society.Chronic isolation of leaders can deepen social trust deficits, erode relational capital, and undermine the culture of dialogue and shared responsibility.This phenomenon is particularly significant in the public sector, where leadership style directly translates into the quality of public services and the sense of institutional justice.Originality/Value: This article represents one of the few empirical analyses of leader loneliness in Poland, combining psychological and organizational perspectives with practical recommendations.The empirical examination of psychosocial mechanisms affecting leadership effectiveness enriches contemporary management science discourse with an affective-relational dimension, often marginalized in quantitative studies.

Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management SeriesVol. 2025(227)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.