Impact of fast charging on battery performance and SOC variations across temperature conditions

The growing demand for electric vehicles has brought fast charging into focus as a practical solution to reduce downtime. However, little is understood about how such rapid charging methods affect battery performance under different temperature conditions, especially in real-world environments. This study examines how ambient temperature, alongside the type of charger used Level 1, Level 2, or DC fast charging affects key battery performance indicators such as state of charge (SOC) gain, energy usage, and long-term capacity behavior. Using data collected from 1320 real-world EV charging sessions, the analysis revealed a significant drop in SOC gain by as much as 27% in sub-zero conditions and 19% when temperatures exceed 40°C. Similarly, energy consumption increased by 20%–25% at these extremes, pointing to the additional power drawn by thermal management systems and reduced charging efficiency. Among the charging types, DC fast chargers were the most sensitive to temperature fluctuations, particularly at high ambient temperatures, where internal resistance effects were more pronounced. A key contribution of this work is the incorporation of electrochemical resistance parameters namely charge transfer resistance (Rct) and electrolyte resistance (Re) into a suite of machine learning models for performance prediction. Of these, the XGBoost model offered the most accurate results, with an R 2 of 0.95 and RMSE of 1.63. Interpretability analysis using SHAP confirmed that Rct and Re were stronger predictors of battery performance than temperature alone. By leveraging real-world data and explainable machine learning, this research offers a more realistic understanding of how EV batteries behave under varying conditions and proposes a path toward more intelligent, temperature-aware battery management systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070251366341
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of fast charging on battery performance and SOC variations across temperature conditions

K. Sebasthirani, G. Rajesh
1 citations
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
article

Impact of fast charging on battery performance and SOC variations across temperature conditions

K. Sebasthirani, G. Rajesh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The growing demand for electric vehicles has brought fast charging into focus as a practical solution to reduce downtime. However, little is understood about how such rapid charging methods affect battery performance under different temperature conditions, especially in real-world environments. This study examines how ambient temperature, alongside the type of charger used Level 1, Level 2, or DC fast charging affects key battery performance indicators such as state of charge (SOC) gain, energy usage, and long-term capacity behavior. Using data collected from 1320 real-world EV charging sessions, the analysis revealed a significant drop in SOC gain by as much as 27% in sub-zero conditions and 19% when temperatures exceed 40°C. Similarly, energy consumption increased by 20%–25% at these extremes, pointing to the additional power drawn by thermal management systems and reduced charging efficiency. Among the charging types, DC fast chargers were the most sensitive to temperature fluctuations, particularly at high ambient temperatures, where internal resistance effects were more pronounced. A key contribution of this work is the incorporation of electrochemical resistance parameters namely charge transfer resistance (Rct) and electrolyte resistance (Re) into a suite of machine learning models for performance prediction. Of these, the XGBoost model offered the most accurate results, with an R 2 of 0.95 and RMSE of 1.63. Interpretability analysis using SHAP confirmed that Rct and Re were stronger predictors of battery performance than temperature alone. By leveraging real-world data and explainable machine learning, this research offers a more realistic understanding of how EV batteries behave under varying conditions and proposes a path toward more intelligent, temperature-aware battery management systems.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering
Anna University, Chennai (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.