EU Policy‐Making in the Digital Age: Major Trends and Insights From Public Policy Research

ABSTRACT Has digitalization changed policy‐making dynamics at the European Union (EU) level? To investigate this issue, this article presents a scoping review of the literature on EU digital policy‐making. While much scholarship adopts a ‘Governance’ approach, two conceptually rich strands emerge: critical approaches, and digital sovereignty. Although these frameworks provide valuable insights, they do not fully capture the specific dynamics that digitalization introduces to the policy‐making process. To bridge this gap, the article suggests two analytical directions rooted in public policy theory. The first focuses on issues related to control through the digital by emphasizing digital instrumentality, exploring how digitalization reshapes traditional boundaries between the political and technical spheres of policy‐making. The second concentrates on the issue of control over the digital, where digital ‘ubiquity’ emerges as a major challenge, calling for analytical frameworks that reflect the cross‐sectoral and hybrid nature of the EU's digital transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Policy Analysis
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70021
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EU Policy‐Making in the Digital Age: Major Trends and Insights From Public Policy Research

Chloé Berut
European Policy Analysis
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

EU Policy‐Making in the Digital Age: Major Trends and Insights From Public Policy Research

Chloé Berut
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Has digitalization changed policy‐making dynamics at the European Union (EU) level? To investigate this issue, this article presents a scoping review of the literature on EU digital policy‐making. While much scholarship adopts a ‘Governance’ approach, two conceptually rich strands emerge: critical approaches, and digital sovereignty. Although these frameworks provide valuable insights, they do not fully capture the specific dynamics that digitalization introduces to the policy‐making process. To bridge this gap, the article suggests two analytical directions rooted in public policy theory. The first focuses on issues related to control through the digital by emphasizing digital instrumentality, exploring how digitalization reshapes traditional boundaries between the political and technical spheres of policy‐making. The second concentrates on the issue of control over the digital, where digital ‘ubiquity’ emerges as a major challenge, calling for analytical frameworks that reflect the cross‐sectoral and hybrid nature of the EU's digital transition.

European Policy Analysis
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.