Comparison of Accuracy in Central Venous Catheter Tip Placement in Right Sided Internal Jugular Vein Using Clinical and Endocavitory ECG Method in Elective Surgeries in a Tertiary Care Center

Introduction: Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is a common and essential procedure in perioperative and critical care management. Accurate catheter tip placement is critical to avoid malposition and complications such as arrhythmia, vascular injury, and thrombosis. Conventionally, chest radiography has been used for confirmation, though it has limitations including time delay and radiation exposure. Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted after obtaining Institutional Human Ethics Committee approval. A total of 90 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery were randomized into two groups: Group A (fixed-depth insertion, n=45) and Group B (endocavitary ECG-guided insertion, n=45). Demographic details, type of procedure, number of attempts, threading difficulty, and complications were documented. Results: The baseline demographics, including age (59.5 ± 9.4 years in Group A vs. 60 ± 11.9 years in Group B, p=0.822), weight (66 ± 8.2 vs. 69.8 ± 16.9, p=0.207), and height (159 ± 5.1 vs. 161 ± 8.0, p=0.406), were comparable between groups. Most patients underwent CABG (84.4% vs. 91.1%). First-attempt success rates were similar (73.3% vs. 66.7%, p=0.49). Difficult threading occurred in 20% of Group A and 28.9% of Group B. Conclusion: Both fixed-depth and ECG-guided CVC insertions were safe and effective, with comparable complication rates. However, ECG guidance demonstrated a higher proportion of catheters positioned optimally at the SVC–RA junction, suggesting its value as a practical, real-time, and radiation-free method to improve accuracy and safety in CVC placement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61770/nbejms.2025.v03.i09.011
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Accuracy in Central Venous Catheter Tip Placement in Right Sided Internal Jugular Vein Using Clinical and Endocavitory ECG Method in Elective Surgeries in a Tertiary Care Center

S Kasthuri, Amar Nandhakumar, Jeevithan Shanmugam, Sharon Kavya Chandana et al.
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
article

Comparison of Accuracy in Central Venous Catheter Tip Placement in Right Sided Internal Jugular Vein Using Clinical and Endocavitory ECG Method in Elective Surgeries in a Tertiary Care Center

S Kasthuri, Amar Nandhakumar, Jeevithan Shanmugam, Sharon Kavya Chandana, Kappian Thamizholi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is a common and essential procedure in perioperative and critical care management. Accurate catheter tip placement is critical to avoid malposition and complications such as arrhythmia, vascular injury, and thrombosis. Conventionally, chest radiography has been used for confirmation, though it has limitations including time delay and radiation exposure. Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted after obtaining Institutional Human Ethics Committee approval. A total of 90 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery were randomized into two groups: Group A (fixed-depth insertion, n=45) and Group B (endocavitary ECG-guided insertion, n=45). Demographic details, type of procedure, number of attempts, threading difficulty, and complications were documented. Results: The baseline demographics, including age (59.5 ± 9.4 years in Group A vs. 60 ± 11.9 years in Group B, p=0.822), weight (66 ± 8.2 vs. 69.8 ± 16.9, p=0.207), and height (159 ± 5.1 vs. 161 ± 8.0, p=0.406), were comparable between groups. Most patients underwent CABG (84.4% vs. 91.1%). First-attempt success rates were similar (73.3% vs. 66.7%, p=0.49). Difficult threading occurred in 20% of Group A and 28.9% of Group B. Conclusion: Both fixed-depth and ECG-guided CVC insertions were safe and effective, with comparable complication rates. However, ECG guidance demonstrated a higher proportion of catheters positioned optimally at the SVC–RA junction, suggesting its value as a practical, real-time, and radiation-free method to improve accuracy and safety in CVC placement.

NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCESVol. 3(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.