Filigrán oltárkereszt restaurálása

The conservation of a filigree-decorated altar cross Based on the marks and inscriptions on its base, the filigree-decorated silver altar cross enclosing the Athos carving was made for the Orthodox community of Kecskemét by Ferenc Pasperger, a silversmith from Pest, in 1815. The most essential, most sacred element of the artefact is the wooden cross protected by glass panes on both sides, which is thought to come from one of the mountain monasteries of Athos in Greece. The artefact became significantly damaged between 1940 and 1986: three filigree decorations and a glass pane have been lost. After the damage, interventions were carried out on the artefact, presumably to improve its symmetry. It has been an important part of the exhibition of the Hungarian Orthodox Church Museum in Miskolc since 1986; it had been cleaned and coated by the conservators of the Herman Ottó Museum before putting it on display. UV-luminescent photographs of the aged protective coating were taken in UV-luminescent light and its composition was identified via required pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS). The fineness of the silver components was determined using a portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) spectrometer. The conservation process required disassembling the artefact for a better access to each part, which was safely carried out by removing the nut on the shaft and opening the silver mount holding the carving. The intricate patterns of the wooden cross were cleaned under stereomicroscope using an insect pin. The protective coating on the filigree surfaces could be removed with an ultrasonic cleaner filled with acetone. Model experiments confirmed an acidic thiourea solution treatment to be the most effective for removing the sulfide corrosion products from the silver surfaces. Replacing the decorative elements missing from the top was ethically problematic because the analysis of available analogies has revealed that the elements adorning the top and side parts of similar artefacts often differ. Solder remnants discovered upon disassembling the artefact have revealed that originally the uppermost element was tied to the side of the cross. The structure of the missing filigree decorations could be inferred from the symmetrical construction of the cross. The three supplements, crafted using silversmithing techniques from 999‰ fine silver, were patinated to match the colour of the artefact, and were fastened on the cross with two-component epoxy adhesive coloured with pigments. The surface protection of the silver was ensured by coating them in a blend of Paraloid B72 and poly(vinyl acetate) dissolved in acetone-toluene-xylene mixture, a recipe refined through targeted model experiments. A replica for the missing glass pane was crafted by a glassworking master.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Műtárgyvédelem
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63396/811779emdqis
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Filigrán oltárkereszt restaurálása

Mátyás Botka
Műtárgyvédelem
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
article

Filigrán oltárkereszt restaurálása

Mátyás Botka
article en

Abstract

The conservation of a filigree-decorated altar cross Based on the marks and inscriptions on its base, the filigree-decorated silver altar cross enclosing the Athos carving was made for the Orthodox community of Kecskemét by Ferenc Pasperger, a silversmith from Pest, in 1815. The most essential, most sacred element of the artefact is the wooden cross protected by glass panes on both sides, which is thought to come from one of the mountain monasteries of Athos in Greece. The artefact became significantly damaged between 1940 and 1986: three filigree decorations and a glass pane have been lost. After the damage, interventions were carried out on the artefact, presumably to improve its symmetry. It has been an important part of the exhibition of the Hungarian Orthodox Church Museum in Miskolc since 1986; it had been cleaned and coated by the conservators of the Herman Ottó Museum before putting it on display. UV-luminescent photographs of the aged protective coating were taken in UV-luminescent light and its composition was identified via required pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS). The fineness of the silver components was determined using a portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) spectrometer. The conservation process required disassembling the artefact for a better access to each part, which was safely carried out by removing the nut on the shaft and opening the silver mount holding the carving. The intricate patterns of the wooden cross were cleaned under stereomicroscope using an insect pin. The protective coating on the filigree surfaces could be removed with an ultrasonic cleaner filled with acetone. Model experiments confirmed an acidic thiourea solution treatment to be the most effective for removing the sulfide corrosion products from the silver surfaces. Replacing the decorative elements missing from the top was ethically problematic because the analysis of available analogies has revealed that the elements adorning the top and side parts of similar artefacts often differ. Solder remnants discovered upon disassembling the artefact have revealed that originally the uppermost element was tied to the side of the cross. The structure of the missing filigree decorations could be inferred from the symmetrical construction of the cross. The three supplements, crafted using silversmithing techniques from 999‰ fine silver, were patinated to match the colour of the artefact, and were fastened on the cross with two-component epoxy adhesive coloured with pigments. The surface protection of the silver was ensured by coating them in a blend of Paraloid B72 and poly(vinyl acetate) dissolved in acetone-toluene-xylene mixture, a recipe refined through targeted model experiments. A replica for the missing glass pane was crafted by a glassworking master.

Műtárgyvédelem(40)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.