A Study on the Motivations behind Marx’s Late-Life Writing of the Anthropology Notebooks

Marx’s intellectual development underwent multiple stages and several significant transformations. In his later years, he shifted his focus from a critique of capitalist political economy to an engagement with the history of “ancient societies.” In particular, the composition of the “Anthropology Notebooks” is regarded within academia as an important theoretical “turn,” provoking widespread scholarly discussion: Why did Marx, prior to the completion of “Capital”, dedicate substantial effort to the study of primitive and pre-capitalist social formations? This paper argues that such a “turn” should not be interpreted as a deviation from Marx’s original theoretical trajectory, but rather as a deepening and extension of the logic inherent in historical materialism. The “Anthropology Notebooks” exemplify an expansion of Marx’s social theoretical horizon, with the primary theoretical motivations arising from three dimensions: first, changes in the historical context; second, the development of his theoretical system; and third, the exigencies posed by contemporary social realities. As an integral component of Marx’s social theory, an inquiry into the motivations behind the writing of the “Anthropology Notebooks” holds significant theoretical value for advancing a comprehensive understanding of his theories on social formations, communicative relations, and the concept of civilization.

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25236/ajhss.2025.080703
Primary Topic
Educational Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on the Motivations behind Marx’s Late-Life Writing of the Anthropology Notebooks

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences
Educational Systems and Policies
article

A Study on the Motivations behind Marx’s Late-Life Writing of the Anthropology Notebooks

article en

Abstract

Marx’s intellectual development underwent multiple stages and several significant transformations. In his later years, he shifted his focus from a critique of capitalist political economy to an engagement with the history of “ancient societies.” In particular, the composition of the “Anthropology Notebooks” is regarded within academia as an important theoretical “turn,” provoking widespread scholarly discussion: Why did Marx, prior to the completion of “Capital”, dedicate substantial effort to the study of primitive and pre-capitalist social formations? This paper argues that such a “turn” should not be interpreted as a deviation from Marx’s original theoretical trajectory, but rather as a deepening and extension of the logic inherent in historical materialism. The “Anthropology Notebooks” exemplify an expansion of Marx’s social theoretical horizon, with the primary theoretical motivations arising from three dimensions: first, changes in the historical context; second, the development of his theoretical system; and third, the exigencies posed by contemporary social realities. As an integral component of Marx’s social theory, an inquiry into the motivations behind the writing of the “Anthropology Notebooks” holds significant theoretical value for advancing a comprehensive understanding of his theories on social formations, communicative relations, and the concept of civilization.

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social SciencesVol. 8(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Educational Systems and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.