AWE and LLMs in L2 Writing Feedback: An Exploration of EFL Learners’ Experiences

In second language (L2) writing instruction, providing real-time personalized feedback at scale within traditional classroom settings poses significant challenges for teachers. Technology tools such as the established Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) and the emerging Large Language Models (LLMs), with their respective strengths, have emerged as viable solutions. To investigate leaners’ experiences with these two distinct computer-generated feedback types, this study examined the cognitive load and perceptions of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students when using AWE and LLMs for writing feedback. A between-group experiment with 76 Chinese university students revealed that both tools induced low to moderate cognitive load, indicating favourable technology acceptance of both tools. Students’ perception ratings for LLMs were slightly higher than those for AWE across all three dimensions. Qualitative data also indicated a strong student preference for LLMs due to their detailed, adaptive, and interactive feedback, though some still favoured AWE for its simplicity. The findings supporting the previous research results that LLMs exhibit significant potential in providing multi-dimensional feedback, AWE remains relevant for certain learners. The study highlights the need for tool selection based on learner proficiency and the potential benefits of integrating Generative AI with traditional AWE methods in L2 writing instruction.

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25236/ajhss.2025.080708
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AWE and LLMs in L2 Writing Feedback: An Exploration of EFL Learners’ Experiences

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

AWE and LLMs in L2 Writing Feedback: An Exploration of EFL Learners’ Experiences

article en

Abstract

In second language (L2) writing instruction, providing real-time personalized feedback at scale within traditional classroom settings poses significant challenges for teachers. Technology tools such as the established Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) and the emerging Large Language Models (LLMs), with their respective strengths, have emerged as viable solutions. To investigate leaners’ experiences with these two distinct computer-generated feedback types, this study examined the cognitive load and perceptions of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students when using AWE and LLMs for writing feedback. A between-group experiment with 76 Chinese university students revealed that both tools induced low to moderate cognitive load, indicating favourable technology acceptance of both tools. Students’ perception ratings for LLMs were slightly higher than those for AWE across all three dimensions. Qualitative data also indicated a strong student preference for LLMs due to their detailed, adaptive, and interactive feedback, though some still favoured AWE for its simplicity. The findings supporting the previous research results that LLMs exhibit significant potential in providing multi-dimensional feedback, AWE remains relevant for certain learners. The study highlights the need for tool selection based on learner proficiency and the potential benefits of integrating Generative AI with traditional AWE methods in L2 writing instruction.

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social SciencesVol. 8(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.