Field Evaluation of Thermal Comfort and Cooling Performance of Underfloor Air Distribution Systems in Stratified Spaces

Indoor environments have received increasing attention in recent years, and achieving high-quality indoor conditions has become increasingly important. Underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems have attracted significant interest due to their potential to improve ventilation efficiency, enhance thermal comfort, and reduce energy consumption. Compared with overhead air distribution (OHAD) systems, UFAD not only offers better energy savings but also demonstrates improved thermal stratification performance. However, most previous studies have relied on numerical simulations to evaluate UFAD performance under specific system designs or scenarios. Few studies have conducted on-site measurements to investigate the combined effects of multiple air-conditioning settings, which are closely related to user control strategies. This study experimentally evaluated the cooling performance and thermal comfort of a UFAD system under different control configurations. By combining variations in airflow rate, temperature setpoints, and supply air distribution, a total of 12 test configurations were examined. The results indicate that configurations with lower temperature setpoints achieved the highest cooling performance. Most test settings produced neutral thermal conditions at heights between 120 and 180 cm, while areas at 60 cm or below were noticeably cooler. These findings provide practical guidance for users in controlling UFAD systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173241
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field Evaluation of Thermal Comfort and Cooling Performance of Underfloor Air Distribution Systems in Stratified Spaces

H. Wang, Chen-Yu Pan, Hsieh-Chih Hsu, Yu-Hsueh Wu
1 citations
Buildings
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.01
article

Field Evaluation of Thermal Comfort and Cooling Performance of Underfloor Air Distribution Systems in Stratified Spaces

H. Wang, Chen-Yu Pan, Hsieh-Chih Hsu, Yu-Hsueh Wu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Indoor environments have received increasing attention in recent years, and achieving high-quality indoor conditions has become increasingly important. Underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems have attracted significant interest due to their potential to improve ventilation efficiency, enhance thermal comfort, and reduce energy consumption. Compared with overhead air distribution (OHAD) systems, UFAD not only offers better energy savings but also demonstrates improved thermal stratification performance. However, most previous studies have relied on numerical simulations to evaluate UFAD performance under specific system designs or scenarios. Few studies have conducted on-site measurements to investigate the combined effects of multiple air-conditioning settings, which are closely related to user control strategies. This study experimentally evaluated the cooling performance and thermal comfort of a UFAD system under different control configurations. By combining variations in airflow rate, temperature setpoints, and supply air distribution, a total of 12 test configurations were examined. The results indicate that configurations with lower temperature setpoints achieved the highest cooling performance. Most test settings produced neutral thermal conditions at heights between 120 and 180 cm, while areas at 60 cm or below were noticeably cooler. These findings provide practical guidance for users in controlling UFAD systems.

BuildingsVol. 15(17)
National Cheng Kung University (TW), Cheng Shiu University (TW)
National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.