Impact of Aerobic Capacity on Mechanical Variables in Track Sprinters and Middle-Distance Runners: A Comparative Study

<b>Background:</b> This study examined the impact of aerobic capacity on force-velocity (F-v) variables and repeated-sprint (RS) performance in male national-level sprinters (SPRs, <i>n</i> = 8; 177.0 ± 4.3 cm; 74.0 ± 5.0 kg; maximal oxygen uptake [VO<sub>2</sub>max]: 55.4 ± 3.0 mL/kg/min) and middle-distance runners (MDRs; <i>n</i> = 8; 179.0 ± 5.1 cm; 67.2 ± 5.0 kg; VO<sub>2</sub>max: 64.3 ± 3.3 mL/kg/min). <b>Method:</b> Participants underwent assessments of aerobic capacity, mechanical F-v profiling in sprinting 2 × 60 m with full recovery, and a 10 × 60 m repeated-sprint test with 30 s recovery. <b>Results:</b> MDRs exhibited significantly higher VO<sub>2</sub>max (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and speed at VO<sub>2</sub>max (vVO<sub>2</sub>max, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while SPRs demonstrated greater anaerobic speed reserve (ASR, <i>p</i> < 0.001), maximal theoretical horizontal force (F<sub>0</sub>, <i>p</i> = 0.012), and power output (P<sub>max</sub>, <i>p</i> < 0.01). During the RS test, SPRs displayed a 16.6% performance decrement (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and failed to complete all sprints with voluntary withdrawal after 5-8 sprints due to exhaustion, whereas MDRs maintained consistent performance. SPRs exhibited a larger decrease in v<sub>0</sub> compared to MDRs (<i>p</i> < 0.01), whereas no differences were observed on F<sub>0</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.519) and P<sub>max</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.758). Blood lactate accumulation was higher in SPRs (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis on the pooled sample identified vVO<sub>2</sub>max (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and not ASR (<i>p</i> = 0.482) as a key predictor of fatigue resistance. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings underscore the critical role of aerobic capacity in sustaining RS performance. Aerobic capacity, specifically vVO<sub>2</sub>max, emerged as the primary determinant of fatigue resistance during repeated sprints, underscoring its critical role in sustaining RS performance over mechanical variables such as v<sub>0</sub> but not F<sub>0</sub> and P<sub>max</sub>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10030342
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Aerobic Capacity on Mechanical Variables in Track Sprinters and Middle-Distance Runners: A Comparative Study

Giorgos Paradisis, Gregory C. Bogdanis, Αθανάσιος Τσούκος, Elias Zacharogiannis et al.
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Sports Performance and Training
article

Impact of Aerobic Capacity on Mechanical Variables in Track Sprinters and Middle-Distance Runners: A Comparative Study

Giorgos Paradisis, Gregory C. Bogdanis, Αθανάσιος Τσούκος, Elias Zacharogiannis, Nikolaos P. Belechris
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> This study examined the impact of aerobic capacity on force-velocity (F-v) variables and repeated-sprint (RS) performance in male national-level sprinters (SPRs, <i>n</i> = 8; 177.0 ± 4.3 cm; 74.0 ± 5.0 kg; maximal oxygen uptake [VO<sub>2</sub>max]: 55.4 ± 3.0 mL/kg/min) and middle-distance runners (MDRs; <i>n</i> = 8; 179.0 ± 5.1 cm; 67.2 ± 5.0 kg; VO<sub>2</sub>max: 64.3 ± 3.3 mL/kg/min). <b>Method:</b> Participants underwent assessments of aerobic capacity, mechanical F-v profiling in sprinting 2 × 60 m with full recovery, and a 10 × 60 m repeated-sprint test with 30 s recovery. <b>Results:</b> MDRs exhibited significantly higher VO<sub>2</sub>max (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and speed at VO<sub>2</sub>max (vVO<sub>2</sub>max, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while SPRs demonstrated greater anaerobic speed reserve (ASR, <i>p</i> < 0.001), maximal theoretical horizontal force (F<sub>0</sub>, <i>p</i> = 0.012), and power output (P<sub>max</sub>, <i>p</i> < 0.01). During the RS test, SPRs displayed a 16.6% performance decrement (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and failed to complete all sprints with voluntary withdrawal after 5-8 sprints due to exhaustion, whereas MDRs maintained consistent performance. SPRs exhibited a larger decrease in v<sub>0</sub> compared to MDRs (<i>p</i> < 0.01), whereas no differences were observed on F<sub>0</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.519) and P<sub>max</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.758). Blood lactate accumulation was higher in SPRs (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis on the pooled sample identified vVO<sub>2</sub>max (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and not ASR (<i>p</i> = 0.482) as a key predictor of fatigue resistance. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings underscore the critical role of aerobic capacity in sustaining RS performance. Aerobic capacity, specifically vVO<sub>2</sub>max, emerged as the primary determinant of fatigue resistance during repeated sprints, underscoring its critical role in sustaining RS performance over mechanical variables such as v<sub>0</sub> but not F<sub>0</sub> and P<sub>max</sub>.

Journal of Functional Morphology and KinesiologyVol. 10(3)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.