Evaluating the regenerative efficacy of titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of gingival recession: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background/Aim. Titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) ? T-PRF was considered a new platelet concentrate that is now frequently used in dentistry. The aim of this study was to examine T-PRF?s regenerative effectiveness in treating gingival recession (GR). Methods. The present study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Medical Subject Headings terms like ?platelet-rich fibrin?, ?platelets?, ?gingival recession?, ?titanium?, and ?root coverage? were used to identify the final included studies. Review Manager software was used to perform the statistical analysis. The value of p ? 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. A total of six studies were included in the systematic review, three of which qualified for meta-analysis. The systematic review suggested that T-PRF is a superior biomaterial in the treatment of GR and showed comparable results to those of the gold standard connective tissue graft (CTG). However, in the meta-analysis at six-month follow-up, for mean root coverage width, the combined effect size across three studies with 272 participants was a standardized mean difference of 0.07 (-0.17, 0.31), indicating no significant difference between the interventions. For mean root coverage depth, the combined effect size was 0.50 (-0.71, 1.70), also showing a non-significant trend favoring one intervention over the other. Conclusion. Within the limitations, the present systematic review suggests clinically improved outcomes with T-PRF. In contrast, the meta-analysis did not show any significant advantage of T-PRF over CTG or PRF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vojnosanitetski pregled
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2298/vsp241029061g
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the regenerative efficacy of titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of gingival recession: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sandhya Kumar, Trinath Kishore Damera, Shiva Shankar Gummaluri, Gurumoorthy Kaarthikeyan et al.
Vojnosanitetski pregled
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Evaluating the regenerative efficacy of titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of gingival recession: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sandhya Kumar, Trinath Kishore Damera, Shiva Shankar Gummaluri, Gurumoorthy Kaarthikeyan, Naveen Gidijala, S S Sai Karthikeyan
article en

Abstract

Background/Aim. Titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) ? T-PRF was considered a new platelet concentrate that is now frequently used in dentistry. The aim of this study was to examine T-PRF?s regenerative effectiveness in treating gingival recession (GR). Methods. The present study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Medical Subject Headings terms like ?platelet-rich fibrin?, ?platelets?, ?gingival recession?, ?titanium?, and ?root coverage? were used to identify the final included studies. Review Manager software was used to perform the statistical analysis. The value of p ? 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. A total of six studies were included in the systematic review, three of which qualified for meta-analysis. The systematic review suggested that T-PRF is a superior biomaterial in the treatment of GR and showed comparable results to those of the gold standard connective tissue graft (CTG). However, in the meta-analysis at six-month follow-up, for mean root coverage width, the combined effect size across three studies with 272 participants was a standardized mean difference of 0.07 (-0.17, 0.31), indicating no significant difference between the interventions. For mean root coverage depth, the combined effect size was 0.50 (-0.71, 1.70), also showing a non-significant trend favoring one intervention over the other. Conclusion. Within the limitations, the present systematic review suggests clinically improved outcomes with T-PRF. In contrast, the meta-analysis did not show any significant advantage of T-PRF over CTG or PRF.

Vojnosanitetski pregledVol. 82(10)
Saveetha University (IN), GITAM University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.