Opening Up? Adoption of Open Science Practices in Democratic Innovation Research

ABSTRACT Innovations in deliberative and participatory democracy have been rapidly adopted by policy makers. Long-term success of democratic reform hinges on developing research through open, reproducible, and ethical standards that secure trust in findings. This study examines how Democratic Innovations (DI) scholars implement open science practices (OSP). We analyze empirical research published in English-language peer-reviewed journals between 1970 and 2021. Our analysis reveals limited OSP use: less than 1% of research articles involve replication and approximately 3.5% provide full data access, despite an increase in the past decade to almost 8% of articles published in 2020. Open publishing has increased, reaching almost 50% of publications in recent years. The article concludes by discussing how OSP can contribute to improving the practice of DI and the policy effects of institutional design. Researchers who understand institutional design for inclusive collective action are best placed to make the changes required to promote open science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PS Political Science & Politics
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096525101297
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opening Up? Adoption of Open Science Practices in Democratic Innovation Research

Matt Ryan, Lala Muradova, Rafael Mestre, Masood Gheasi et al.
PS Political Science & Politics
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Opening Up? Adoption of Open Science Practices in Democratic Innovation Research

Matt Ryan, Lala Muradova, Rafael Mestre, Masood Gheasi, Geoffrey Bolton
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Innovations in deliberative and participatory democracy have been rapidly adopted by policy makers. Long-term success of democratic reform hinges on developing research through open, reproducible, and ethical standards that secure trust in findings. This study examines how Democratic Innovations (DI) scholars implement open science practices (OSP). We analyze empirical research published in English-language peer-reviewed journals between 1970 and 2021. Our analysis reveals limited OSP use: less than 1% of research articles involve replication and approximately 3.5% provide full data access, despite an increase in the past decade to almost 8% of articles published in 2020. Open publishing has increased, reaching almost 50% of publications in recent years. The article concludes by discussing how OSP can contribute to improving the practice of DI and the policy effects of institutional design. Researchers who understand institutional design for inclusive collective action are best placed to make the changes required to promote open science.

PS Political Science & PoliticsVol. 59(1)
Erasmus MC (NL), University of Southampton (GB), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL), Erasmus Brussels University of Applied Sciences and Arts (BE)
UK Research and Innovation, University of Southampton
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Opening Up? Adoption of Open Science Practices in Democratic Innovation Research — Matt Ryan, Lala Muradova, et al. · PS Political Science & Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS