Beyond flower strips – restoring biodiversity needs more landscape heterogeneity

Restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes requires non-crop habitats that provide complementary and additional resources to those provided by agricultural land. In the European Union, flower strips have become the most popular restoration measure in the last decade, due to their esthetic value, benefits for flower visitors and fast implementation. However, the overreliance on annual flower strips rather than on landscape-wide habitat diversity undermines the agri-environmental goal of a heterogeneous landscape promoting multitaxa biodiversity. Annual flower strips support only a limited spectrum of plant and animal species and we argue that successful biodiversity conservation needs many types of habitats, such as diversified and small-scale croplands in combination with annual, perennial and woody semi-natural terrestrial habitats as well as running and stagnant freshwater bodies. Spatial and temporal habitat heterogeneity and resource continuity allows for spillover across multiple habitat types, meta-community dynamics, high beta diversity and the provision of major ecosystem services such as crop pollination and biological pest control. Implementation of agri-environmental schemes should be more diversified and broadened from the field and farm to the landscape level, based on collaboration of farmers and other stakeholders. We need to foster socio-ecological multifunctionality in biodiversity-friendly agricultural landscapes characterized by diversified and small-scale farming as well as restoration of at least 20 % semi-natural habitat. • Overreliance on flower strips rather than landscape heterogeneity undermines biodiversity. • Successful biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes needs many habitat types. • Facilitating spillover across habitat and metacommunity dynamics reduces extinction probability. • Socio-ecological multifunctionality relies on biodiversity and associated ecosystem services. • Diversified small-scale farming and habitat restoration require collaboration of all stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111474
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond flower strips – restoring biodiversity needs more landscape heterogeneity

S. Schüler, Carolina Ocampo‐Ariza, Wiebke Kämper, R Koch et al.
1 citations
Biological Conservation
Plant and animal studies
3.03
article

Beyond flower strips – restoring biodiversity needs more landscape heterogeneity

S. Schüler, Carolina Ocampo‐Ariza, Wiebke Kämper, R Koch, Isabelle Arimond, Teja Tscharntke, I. Heyer, Elena Velado‐Alonso, Mina Anders, Marco Ferrante, Annika L. Hass, Nicole Beyer, Catrin Westphal, Ira Hannappel, Bea Maas, Olivia Bernhardsson, Kathrin Czechofsky, Alfred Kok, Michael Koch, Qian Zhang, Kyra Zembold
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes requires non-crop habitats that provide complementary and additional resources to those provided by agricultural land. In the European Union, flower strips have become the most popular restoration measure in the last decade, due to their esthetic value, benefits for flower visitors and fast implementation. However, the overreliance on annual flower strips rather than on landscape-wide habitat diversity undermines the agri-environmental goal of a heterogeneous landscape promoting multitaxa biodiversity. Annual flower strips support only a limited spectrum of plant and animal species and we argue that successful biodiversity conservation needs many types of habitats, such as diversified and small-scale croplands in combination with annual, perennial and woody semi-natural terrestrial habitats as well as running and stagnant freshwater bodies. Spatial and temporal habitat heterogeneity and resource continuity allows for spillover across multiple habitat types, meta-community dynamics, high beta diversity and the provision of major ecosystem services such as crop pollination and biological pest control. Implementation of agri-environmental schemes should be more diversified and broadened from the field and farm to the landscape level, based on collaboration of farmers and other stakeholders. We need to foster socio-ecological multifunctionality in biodiversity-friendly agricultural landscapes characterized by diversified and small-scale farming as well as restoration of at least 20 % semi-natural habitat. • Overreliance on flower strips rather than landscape heterogeneity undermines biodiversity. • Successful biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes needs many habitat types. • Facilitating spillover across habitat and metacommunity dynamics reduces extinction probability. • Socio-ecological multifunctionality relies on biodiversity and associated ecosystem services. • Diversified small-scale farming and habitat restoration require collaboration of all stakeholders.

Biological ConservationVol. 312
University of Vienna (AT), University of Potsdam (DE), Institute for Biodiversity (DE), Evolutionary Genomics (United States) (US), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE), University of Rostock (DE), University of Göttingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Plant and animal studies
3.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.