Effects of experimental gastric acid pH on fixed indirect restorative materials made using CAD/CAM: Systematic review

Objective: To analyze how acidic pH affects the stability and properties of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Methods: This review followed PRISMA 2020. Searches were run in MEDLINE (via PubMed), ScienceDirect, and Web of Science using MeSH and free-text terms. In addition, the JBI critical appraisal checklist was used for quality assessment, based on the types of items analyzed. Results: After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the review focused on 15 articles, including randomized clinical trials, quasi-experimental studies, and a narrative review of the literature, primarily high-level studies. Conclusion:. Zirconia and lithium disilicate showed superior aesthetic stability, flexural strength, and surface integrity under acidic conditions, while feldspathic and resin-matrix materials were more susceptible to degradation. Glazing helped reduce surface deterioration. The lack of standardized methodologies limits comparability, highlighting the need for future research to guide clinical recommendations.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Carcinogenesis
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64149/j.carcinog.24.3s.79-102
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of experimental gastric acid pH on fixed indirect restorative materials made using CAD/CAM: Systematic review

Journal of Carcinogenesis
Dental materials and restorations
article

Effects of experimental gastric acid pH on fixed indirect restorative materials made using CAD/CAM: Systematic review

article en

Abstract

Objective: To analyze how acidic pH affects the stability and properties of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Methods: This review followed PRISMA 2020. Searches were run in MEDLINE (via PubMed), ScienceDirect, and Web of Science using MeSH and free-text terms. In addition, the JBI critical appraisal checklist was used for quality assessment, based on the types of items analyzed. Results: After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the review focused on 15 articles, including randomized clinical trials, quasi-experimental studies, and a narrative review of the literature, primarily high-level studies. Conclusion:. Zirconia and lithium disilicate showed superior aesthetic stability, flexural strength, and surface integrity under acidic conditions, while feldspathic and resin-matrix materials were more susceptible to degradation. Glazing helped reduce surface deterioration. The lack of standardized methodologies limits comparability, highlighting the need for future research to guide clinical recommendations.

Journal of Carcinogenesis
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.