Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Endoscopy in Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Tumors: A review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Introduction: Early and accurate detection of gastrointestinal (GI) tumors is crucial to reduce their associated high morbidity, mortality, and financial burden. Recent advancements in health technology have led to the development of AI-assisted endoscopy, which has been studied as potential tool to increase early and accurate GI tumors detection. This review aims to summarize systematic reviews and meta-analyses on AI-assisted endoscopy in diagnosing GI tumors. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, DOAJ, AJOL, and the Cochrane Library, along with manual searches. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses focusing on AI-assisted endoscopy for GI tumor diagnosis were included based on pre-specified criteria. Relevant data were extracted and summarized to present different metrics AI endoscopy in GI tumors diagnosis. Results: From 569 studies identified, 23 systematic reviews with meta-analyses were included. 6 focused on detection rates, and 17 examined diagnostic accuracy. AI-assisted endoscopy showed a significantly higher detection rate for GI tumors compared to conventional endoscopy. Additionally, AI-assisted endoscopy showed high diagnostic accuracy in detecting different types of GI tumors. However, variability in detection rate and accuracy results across different AI algorithms and studies was noted. Conclusion: AI-assisted endoscopy offers high diagnostic accuracy and improved tumor detection than conventional endoscopy. Meanwhile, rigorous evaluation of AI models is necessary to ensure clinical reliability. Additionally, AI should enhance clinical decision-making rather than replace clinicians. Addressing ethical concerns and further research are essential for optimizing AI in healthcare.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52648/igss.1004_85
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Endoscopy in Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Tumors: A review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Sulymon Ayobami Saka, Olivier Sibomana, Lewis Tem Bueh, Richard Omoefe Oveh et al.
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Endoscopy in Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Tumors: A review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Sulymon Ayobami Saka, Olivier Sibomana, Lewis Tem Bueh, Richard Omoefe Oveh, Marie Grace Uwizeyimana, Alex Mwangi Kihunyu, Abraham Obianke, Samuel Oluwo Damilare, Beloved of God Agbelemoge
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Early and accurate detection of gastrointestinal (GI) tumors is crucial to reduce their associated high morbidity, mortality, and financial burden. Recent advancements in health technology have led to the development of AI-assisted endoscopy, which has been studied as potential tool to increase early and accurate GI tumors detection. This review aims to summarize systematic reviews and meta-analyses on AI-assisted endoscopy in diagnosing GI tumors. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, DOAJ, AJOL, and the Cochrane Library, along with manual searches. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses focusing on AI-assisted endoscopy for GI tumor diagnosis were included based on pre-specified criteria. Relevant data were extracted and summarized to present different metrics AI endoscopy in GI tumors diagnosis. Results: From 569 studies identified, 23 systematic reviews with meta-analyses were included. 6 focused on detection rates, and 17 examined diagnostic accuracy. AI-assisted endoscopy showed a significantly higher detection rate for GI tumors compared to conventional endoscopy. Additionally, AI-assisted endoscopy showed high diagnostic accuracy in detecting different types of GI tumors. However, variability in detection rate and accuracy results across different AI algorithms and studies was noted. Conclusion: AI-assisted endoscopy offers high diagnostic accuracy and improved tumor detection than conventional endoscopy. Meanwhile, rigorous evaluation of AI models is necessary to ensure clinical reliability. Additionally, AI should enhance clinical decision-making rather than replace clinicians. Addressing ethical concerns and further research are essential for optimizing AI in healthcare.

(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Endoscopy in Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Tumors: A review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses — Sulymon Ayobami Saka, Olivier Sibomana, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS