Intent to Die and Suicide Attempts: Exploring Clinical and Circumstantial Correlates

Introduction Intent to die is a crucial factor in assessing the risk of suicide attempts, which is difficult to measure. Objectives This study examined the characteristics of suicide attempters based on intent to die and aimed to investigate whether clinical and circumstantial evidence can support the assessment of the intent to die. Methods A total of 3486 suicide attempters who visited emergency department were divided into two groups: intent to die(n=1085, 31.1%) and no intent to die(n=2401, 68.9%). Demographic variables, clinical characteristics, and factors related to suicide attempt between the two groups were analyzed. Results Suicide attempters who reported an intent to die were older (46.7 ± 21.7 vs. 40.5 ± 19.3, t=8.460, p < 0.001), had a higher proportion of males (41.1% vs. 33.4%, χ2=19.174, p < 0.001), were more likely to be unemployed (60.6% vs. 51.0%, χ2=26.954, p < 0.001), had lower socioeconomic status (34.1% vs. 23.4%, χ2=44.365, p < 0.001), and experienced more severe depression (76.6% vs. 49.6%, χ2=230.442, p < 0.001), intense emotions (92.9% vs. 80.0%, χ2=91.138, p < 0.001), agitation (45.5% vs. 40.4%, χ2=7.734, p < 0.01), and hopelessness/helplessness (86.1% vs. 60.7%, χ2=221.980, p < 0.001) compared to those who did not report an intent to die. Moreover, suicide attempters who reported an intent to die showed more repetitive/intense/continuous suicide ideation (79.8% vs. 42.8%, χ2=410.830, p < 0.001), a higher rate of multiple attempts (46.5% vs. 41.1%, χ2=8.637, p < 0.005), higher medical risk of death (3.6 ± 1.3 vs. 3.0 ± 1.1, t=15.633, p < 0.001), a higher total risk score (9.5 ± 2.2 vs. 8.3 ± 2.0, t=25.596, p < 0.001), and a lower total rescue score (12.1 ± 2.0 vs. 12.7 ± 1.9, t=8.649, p < 0.001) compared to those who did not report an intent to die. Some circumstantial factors such as planned attempts (19.4% vs. 2.3%, χ2=307.079, p < 0.001), presence of suicide notes (21.3% vs. 9.8%, χ2=83.625, p < 0.001), absence of regret (75.1% vs. 51.2%, χ2=174.849, p < 0.001), and high lethality of suicide methods (18.0% vs. 9.2%, χ2=56.161, p < 0.001) showed statistical significant differences, but some proportions of suicide attempters who did not report an intent to die also exhibited these circumstantial factors. Conclusions The present study suggests that suicide attempters who reported an intent to die tend to have more severe psychopathologies and serious suicide attempts related to direct factors than suicide attempters who did not report an intent to die. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2358
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intent to Die and Suicide Attempts: Exploring Clinical and Circumstantial Correlates

K.-U. Lee, Kyoung Ho Choi, Jung Tak Park
European Psychiatry
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Intent to Die and Suicide Attempts: Exploring Clinical and Circumstantial Correlates

K.-U. Lee, Kyoung Ho Choi, Jung Tak Park
article en

Abstract

Introduction Intent to die is a crucial factor in assessing the risk of suicide attempts, which is difficult to measure. Objectives This study examined the characteristics of suicide attempters based on intent to die and aimed to investigate whether clinical and circumstantial evidence can support the assessment of the intent to die. Methods A total of 3486 suicide attempters who visited emergency department were divided into two groups: intent to die(n=1085, 31.1%) and no intent to die(n=2401, 68.9%). Demographic variables, clinical characteristics, and factors related to suicide attempt between the two groups were analyzed. Results Suicide attempters who reported an intent to die were older (46.7 ± 21.7 vs. 40.5 ± 19.3, t=8.460, p < 0.001), had a higher proportion of males (41.1% vs. 33.4%, χ2=19.174, p < 0.001), were more likely to be unemployed (60.6% vs. 51.0%, χ2=26.954, p < 0.001), had lower socioeconomic status (34.1% vs. 23.4%, χ2=44.365, p < 0.001), and experienced more severe depression (76.6% vs. 49.6%, χ2=230.442, p < 0.001), intense emotions (92.9% vs. 80.0%, χ2=91.138, p < 0.001), agitation (45.5% vs. 40.4%, χ2=7.734, p < 0.01), and hopelessness/helplessness (86.1% vs. 60.7%, χ2=221.980, p < 0.001) compared to those who did not report an intent to die. Moreover, suicide attempters who reported an intent to die showed more repetitive/intense/continuous suicide ideation (79.8% vs. 42.8%, χ2=410.830, p < 0.001), a higher rate of multiple attempts (46.5% vs. 41.1%, χ2=8.637, p < 0.005), higher medical risk of death (3.6 ± 1.3 vs. 3.0 ± 1.1, t=15.633, p < 0.001), a higher total risk score (9.5 ± 2.2 vs. 8.3 ± 2.0, t=25.596, p < 0.001), and a lower total rescue score (12.1 ± 2.0 vs. 12.7 ± 1.9, t=8.649, p < 0.001) compared to those who did not report an intent to die. Some circumstantial factors such as planned attempts (19.4% vs. 2.3%, χ2=307.079, p < 0.001), presence of suicide notes (21.3% vs. 9.8%, χ2=83.625, p < 0.001), absence of regret (75.1% vs. 51.2%, χ2=174.849, p < 0.001), and high lethality of suicide methods (18.0% vs. 9.2%, χ2=56.161, p < 0.001) showed statistical significant differences, but some proportions of suicide attempters who did not report an intent to die also exhibited these circumstantial factors. Conclusions The present study suggests that suicide attempters who reported an intent to die tend to have more severe psychopathologies and serious suicide attempts related to direct factors than suicide attempters who did not report an intent to die. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.