Can the Stroop Test Be Useful in Differentiating Specific Learning Disorder from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder?

Introduction Specific Learning Disorder (SLD) is a significant comorbidity in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Both ADHD and SLD are neurodevelopmental conditions that share common characteristics, such as deficits in executive functions. Identifying SLD in patients with ADHD is crucial because targeted educational interventions are the primary treatment for SLD. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the Stroop Test (ST) in differentiating SLD from ADHD. Methods 79 patients (42 with ADHD and 37 with both ADHD and SLD) participated in the study. Sociodemographic information and ST performance metrics (completion time, omission errors, and commission errors) were collected by a child and adolescent psychiatrist. Additionally, parents completed the Turgay DSM-IV ADHD Rating Scale to assess the severity of ADHD symptoms. Results There were no significant differences between the ADHD and ADHD+SLD groups regarding age, gender, or ADHD symptom severity. The ADHD+SLD group exhibited longer completion times across all sections of the ST. Omission errors in the fourth and fifth sections were significantly higher in the ADHD+SLD group. After adjusting for age, gender, and ADHD symptom severity, the completion time in the fifth section and omission errors in the fourth and fifth sections remained significant. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis identified cut-off scores for the fifth section’s completion time (42 seconds; Sensitivity: 0.62, Specificity: 0.66) and omission errors (1 error; Sensitivity: 0.64, Specificity: 0.61). Moreover, omission errors in the fifth section predicted being in the ADHD+SLD group (p= .006, Odds Ratio [OR]= 1.527, 95% CI= 1.127–2.068). Conclusions The findings suggest that the ST may be a valuable tool for diagnosing SLD in patients with ADHD. In particular, the completion time and omission errors in the fifth section of the ST may serve as practical diagnostic indicators. Further research with larger sample sizes is necessary to confirm these results. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.449
Primary Topic
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can the Stroop Test Be Useful in Differentiating Specific Learning Disorder from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder?

M. E. Tezcan, Hasan Ali Güler, Merve Kuz, Furkan Uğur Dündar
European Psychiatry
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
article

Can the Stroop Test Be Useful in Differentiating Specific Learning Disorder from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder?

M. E. Tezcan, Hasan Ali Güler, Merve Kuz, Furkan Uğur Dündar
article en

Abstract

Introduction Specific Learning Disorder (SLD) is a significant comorbidity in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Both ADHD and SLD are neurodevelopmental conditions that share common characteristics, such as deficits in executive functions. Identifying SLD in patients with ADHD is crucial because targeted educational interventions are the primary treatment for SLD. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the Stroop Test (ST) in differentiating SLD from ADHD. Methods 79 patients (42 with ADHD and 37 with both ADHD and SLD) participated in the study. Sociodemographic information and ST performance metrics (completion time, omission errors, and commission errors) were collected by a child and adolescent psychiatrist. Additionally, parents completed the Turgay DSM-IV ADHD Rating Scale to assess the severity of ADHD symptoms. Results There were no significant differences between the ADHD and ADHD+SLD groups regarding age, gender, or ADHD symptom severity. The ADHD+SLD group exhibited longer completion times across all sections of the ST. Omission errors in the fourth and fifth sections were significantly higher in the ADHD+SLD group. After adjusting for age, gender, and ADHD symptom severity, the completion time in the fifth section and omission errors in the fourth and fifth sections remained significant. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis identified cut-off scores for the fifth section’s completion time (42 seconds; Sensitivity: 0.62, Specificity: 0.66) and omission errors (1 error; Sensitivity: 0.64, Specificity: 0.61). Moreover, omission errors in the fifth section predicted being in the ADHD+SLD group (p= .006, Odds Ratio [OR]= 1.527, 95% CI= 1.127–2.068). Conclusions The findings suggest that the ST may be a valuable tool for diagnosing SLD in patients with ADHD. In particular, the completion time and omission errors in the fifth section of the ST may serve as practical diagnostic indicators. Further research with larger sample sizes is necessary to confirm these results. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Selçuk University (TR), Konya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.