Water Management Strategies and Yield Response in Pecan Orchards: A Comparative Analysis of Irrigation Systems

Although substantial research has been conducted on pecan cultivation, studies that account for variability in farm scale, from small to large commercial operations, are still needed. To address this gap, the primary objective of the present study was to quantify and compare groundwater recharge rates and crop yield in pecan orchards utilizing different irrigation systems. This investigation employed in-orchard water budget measurements combined with analytical water balance models to facilitate comparative analysis between orchard sizes. The study tested the hypothesis that groundwater recharge rates vary significantly with farm scale, with larger commercial orchards exhibiting higher recharge rates than their small-scale counterparts. Analysis of 2021–2023 irrigation data revealed significant variability in deep percolation (DP) as a percentage of total water applied (TWA) across orchard sites, ranging from 0% to 52%, with P1 exhibiting the highest recharge and yield, while P2 had the lowest due to limited irrigation. ANOVA revealed significant differences in DP and yield among sites, with P1 outperforming the others. CWP averaged 0.33 kg/m3 but varied considerably by site (0.12–0.42 kg/m3). The results showed significant variability in DP, highlighting its dependence on management practices. These findings emphasize the critical role of site-specific irrigation strategies in optimizing productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17182715
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water Management Strategies and Yield Response in Pecan Orchards: A Comparative Analysis of Irrigation Systems

Richard J. Heerema, Alexander G. Fernald, Jorge Preciado, A. Salim Bawazir
Water
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
article

Water Management Strategies and Yield Response in Pecan Orchards: A Comparative Analysis of Irrigation Systems

Richard J. Heerema, Alexander G. Fernald, Jorge Preciado, A. Salim Bawazir
article en

Abstract

Although substantial research has been conducted on pecan cultivation, studies that account for variability in farm scale, from small to large commercial operations, are still needed. To address this gap, the primary objective of the present study was to quantify and compare groundwater recharge rates and crop yield in pecan orchards utilizing different irrigation systems. This investigation employed in-orchard water budget measurements combined with analytical water balance models to facilitate comparative analysis between orchard sizes. The study tested the hypothesis that groundwater recharge rates vary significantly with farm scale, with larger commercial orchards exhibiting higher recharge rates than their small-scale counterparts. Analysis of 2021–2023 irrigation data revealed significant variability in deep percolation (DP) as a percentage of total water applied (TWA) across orchard sites, ranging from 0% to 52%, with P1 exhibiting the highest recharge and yield, while P2 had the lowest due to limited irrigation. ANOVA revealed significant differences in DP and yield among sites, with P1 outperforming the others. CWP averaged 0.33 kg/m3 but varied considerably by site (0.12–0.42 kg/m3). The results showed significant variability in DP, highlighting its dependence on management practices. These findings emphasize the critical role of site-specific irrigation strategies in optimizing productivity.

WaterVol. 17(18)
New Mexico State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.