Measuring inequality in high dimensions: a Gini-based approach

While classical inequality indices–such as the Gini and pq-mean indices–satisfy a set of six desirable axiomatic properties in the univariate case (Hurley and Rickard. Comparing measures of sparsity. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 2009;55(10):4723–4741. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2009.2027527), extending these properties to the multivariate context poses a significant challenge, primarily due to the absence of a natural ordering in higher dimensions. Previous multivariate generalizations, although mathematically elegant, often lack interpretability and fail to preserve scale invariance. We analyze the approach proposed in Auricchio et al. (Extending the Gini index to higher dimensions via whitening processes. Rend Lincei. 2025;35(3):511–528), demonstrating that, under suitable conditions, it yields a multivariate Gini index that satisfies all six axioms and offers a practical, interpretable framework for measuring the unevenness of high-dimensional data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02331888.2025.2557466
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring inequality in high dimensions: a Gini-based approach

Gabriele Loli, Giuseppe Toscani, Gennaro Auricchio
Statistics
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Measuring inequality in high dimensions: a Gini-based approach

Gabriele Loli, Giuseppe Toscani, Gennaro Auricchio
article en

Abstract

While classical inequality indices–such as the Gini and pq-mean indices–satisfy a set of six desirable axiomatic properties in the univariate case (Hurley and Rickard. Comparing measures of sparsity. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 2009;55(10):4723–4741. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2009.2027527), extending these properties to the multivariate context poses a significant challenge, primarily due to the absence of a natural ordering in higher dimensions. Previous multivariate generalizations, although mathematically elegant, often lack interpretability and fail to preserve scale invariance. We analyze the approach proposed in Auricchio et al. (Extending the Gini index to higher dimensions via whitening processes. Rend Lincei. 2025;35(3):511–528), demonstrating that, under suitable conditions, it yields a multivariate Gini index that satisfies all six axioms and offers a practical, interpretable framework for measuring the unevenness of high-dimensional data.

StatisticsVol. 60(2)
University of Padua (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Measuring inequality in high dimensions: a Gini-based approach — Gabriele Loli, Giuseppe Toscani, et al. · Statistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS