Use of Psychological Interventions by Healthcare Workers in Post-COVID-19 Period: Longitudinal Study

Introduction Despite healthcare workers (HCWs) facing mental health challenges during COVID-19, their use of psychological support is limited. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for identifying mental health needs and vulnerable groups within Spanish healthcare services. Objectives This study analyzes psychological support use among Spanish HCWs post-pandemic onset over 2 years, and its link to workplace and COVID-19 factors from 2020 data. Methods Longitudinal research involved Spanish HCWs. Data from online surveys covered demographics (age and gender), depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), workplace-and COVID-19-related factors (type of job, direct exposure to COVID-19 patients, adequate access to personal protective equipment, social stigma for working with COVID-19 patients, decision making on patient prioritization, and perceived social network support at work), and psychological support use across 2020, 2021, and 2022. We received responses from 296, 294, and 251 participants at time points 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Results Predominantly female participants (n=242, 82%) and with a median age of 43 years. Psychological support seeking increased from 15% in 2020 to 23% in 2022. Notably, one in four HCWs not seeking help showed major depressive disorder symptoms. Predictors for seeking support included patient prioritization decision-making (OR 5.59, 95% CI 2.47-12.63) and probable depression (wave 2: OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.19; wave 3: OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.16). Table 1 shows the association between workplace- and COVID-19-related variables at baseline and use of psychological support at follow-up. Table 1. Wave 2 Wave 3 Odds ratio 95% CI Odds ratio 95% CI Direct exposure to COVID-19 patients 2.03 (0.93, 4.41) 1.03 (0.53, 2.03) Access to protective equipment 0.81 (0.55, 1.19) 1.10 (0.75, 1.60) Social stigma for working with COVID-19 patients 1.20 (0.84, 1.71) 1.13 (0.80, 1.60) Patient prioritization 5.59 (2.47, 12.63) 1.45 (0.64, 3.26) Social support from colleagues 1.45 (0.88, 2.41) 1.17 (0.75, 1.85) Conclusions A significant portion of HCWs may seek psychological support post-pandemic, regardless of prior workplace or COVID-19 stressors. Targeted mental health initiatives are crucial, emphasizing health promotion, primary prevention, and support for individuals, including those with depressive symptoms. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.1271
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of Psychological Interventions by Healthcare Workers in Post-COVID-19 Period: Longitudinal Study

Río Aguilar, María Fe Bravo‐Ortiz, Carmen Bayón, B. García-Vázquez
European Psychiatry
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Use of Psychological Interventions by Healthcare Workers in Post-COVID-19 Period: Longitudinal Study

Río Aguilar, María Fe Bravo‐Ortiz, Carmen Bayón, B. García-Vázquez
article en

Abstract

Introduction Despite healthcare workers (HCWs) facing mental health challenges during COVID-19, their use of psychological support is limited. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for identifying mental health needs and vulnerable groups within Spanish healthcare services. Objectives This study analyzes psychological support use among Spanish HCWs post-pandemic onset over 2 years, and its link to workplace and COVID-19 factors from 2020 data. Methods Longitudinal research involved Spanish HCWs. Data from online surveys covered demographics (age and gender), depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), workplace-and COVID-19-related factors (type of job, direct exposure to COVID-19 patients, adequate access to personal protective equipment, social stigma for working with COVID-19 patients, decision making on patient prioritization, and perceived social network support at work), and psychological support use across 2020, 2021, and 2022. We received responses from 296, 294, and 251 participants at time points 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Results Predominantly female participants (n=242, 82%) and with a median age of 43 years. Psychological support seeking increased from 15% in 2020 to 23% in 2022. Notably, one in four HCWs not seeking help showed major depressive disorder symptoms. Predictors for seeking support included patient prioritization decision-making (OR 5.59, 95% CI 2.47-12.63) and probable depression (wave 2: OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.19; wave 3: OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.16). Table 1 shows the association between workplace- and COVID-19-related variables at baseline and use of psychological support at follow-up. Table 1. Wave 2 Wave 3 Odds ratio 95% CI Odds ratio 95% CI Direct exposure to COVID-19 patients 2.03 (0.93, 4.41) 1.03 (0.53, 2.03) Access to protective equipment 0.81 (0.55, 1.19) 1.10 (0.75, 1.60) Social stigma for working with COVID-19 patients 1.20 (0.84, 1.71) 1.13 (0.80, 1.60) Patient prioritization 5.59 (2.47, 12.63) 1.45 (0.64, 3.26) Social support from colleagues 1.45 (0.88, 2.41) 1.17 (0.75, 1.85) Conclusions A significant portion of HCWs may seek psychological support post-pandemic, regardless of prior workplace or COVID-19 stressors. Targeted mental health initiatives are crucial, emphasizing health promotion, primary prevention, and support for individuals, including those with depressive symptoms. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES), Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (ES), Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.