Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) and treatment response of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

Introduction Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) is commonly defined as an inadequate response to two or more antidepressant trials. The severity of TRD can be evaluated by means of the Maudsley Staging Method (MSM). The MSM consists of five domains including duration of the depression, symptom severity, number of treatment failures, augmentation therapy, and electroconvulsive therapy use. The Danish Medicines Council has suggested that the MSM could guide treatment decisions. However, the use of MSM in clinical practice is lagging and the evaluation of TRD in clinical practice has remained subjective and unstandardized. Objectives To evaluate the use of MSM in clinical practice, we investigate the association between MSM scores and response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment, as measured by the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17). Methods Patients with unipolar depression referred to six weeks of treatment with rTMS were consecutively invited to participate in the study. The study was a multi-center study with inclusion sites in Randers, Viborg, and Skejby, Denmark. Demographic information and clinical data were retrieved from the patient’s Electronic Health Record (EHR). The patients were assessed on the MSM within the first two weeks of the treatment. Ratings on the HAM-D17 and self-administered questionnaires including the depressive symptoms, side effects, and quality of life were completed on a weekly basis. Additionally, three side-effect interview assessments were conducted during the six weeks rTMS treatment. A power calculation estimated the inclusion of 65 patients. Response is to be evaluated by means of the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rho) between MSM score and HAM-D17. An adequate response is defined as a 50% decrease in the Hamilton score or below the threshold for remission. Results Data collection is ongoing. As of September 2024, a total of 59 out of 65 participants have been recruited. Preliminary results will be presented at the EPA 2025 Congress. Conclusions A systematic assessment of TRD according to the MSM in clinical practice, holds promise for predicting treatment outcomes and guiding treatment decisions. Integrating MSM, for instance, during the recording of patient medical history, could enhance its practical utility in everyday clinical settings. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.1329
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) and treatment response of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

Pernille Kølbæk, Susana P. Alves, Lone Holst, Michael Pedersen et al.
European Psychiatry
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) and treatment response of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

Pernille Kølbæk, Susana P. Alves, Lone Holst, Michael Pedersen, Christiane Gasse, Maria Simonsen Speed, Michael Sørensen
article en

Abstract

Introduction Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) is commonly defined as an inadequate response to two or more antidepressant trials. The severity of TRD can be evaluated by means of the Maudsley Staging Method (MSM). The MSM consists of five domains including duration of the depression, symptom severity, number of treatment failures, augmentation therapy, and electroconvulsive therapy use. The Danish Medicines Council has suggested that the MSM could guide treatment decisions. However, the use of MSM in clinical practice is lagging and the evaluation of TRD in clinical practice has remained subjective and unstandardized. Objectives To evaluate the use of MSM in clinical practice, we investigate the association between MSM scores and response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment, as measured by the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17). Methods Patients with unipolar depression referred to six weeks of treatment with rTMS were consecutively invited to participate in the study. The study was a multi-center study with inclusion sites in Randers, Viborg, and Skejby, Denmark. Demographic information and clinical data were retrieved from the patient’s Electronic Health Record (EHR). The patients were assessed on the MSM within the first two weeks of the treatment. Ratings on the HAM-D17 and self-administered questionnaires including the depressive symptoms, side effects, and quality of life were completed on a weekly basis. Additionally, three side-effect interview assessments were conducted during the six weeks rTMS treatment. A power calculation estimated the inclusion of 65 patients. Response is to be evaluated by means of the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rho) between MSM score and HAM-D17. An adequate response is defined as a 50% decrease in the Hamilton score or below the threshold for remission. Results Data collection is ongoing. As of September 2024, a total of 59 out of 65 participants have been recruited. Preliminary results will be presented at the EPA 2025 Congress. Conclusions A systematic assessment of TRD according to the MSM in clinical practice, holds promise for predicting treatment outcomes and guiding treatment decisions. Integrating MSM, for instance, during the recording of patient medical history, could enhance its practical utility in everyday clinical settings. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Regional Hospital Randers (DK), Regional Hospital Central Jutland (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.